If the Liberals are not trying to "take our guns" why did DC v. Heller and Chicago v. McDonald go all the way to the US Supreme Court? Were DC and Chicago all for gun ownership and everyone was just confused? It's not that Liberals are going to take our guns; they already have!
So, this means it's time to force the northeastern liberals to move somewhere with a warmer climate, like Mexico, to help cut heating related CO2 emissions? It's for the planet, right??? (To the indignant northeastern liberals who are going to reply to me, yes, it takes more energy to heat a home from 30F to 70F than to air condition a 70F room in a 95F environment.)
I can't believe the only non-sheep post here was modded as a troll. Good grief, people! Wake up! The FCC and FEC are going to make it illegal to criticize incumbent politicians on the internet and most of the Slashdotters will cheer them on every step of the way. "Give government full control of the internet! We'll protect you from slow speeds! (And free speech, and porn, and satire, etc.)"
If your ISP is giving you bad service, grow a pair of f***ing balls and drop the service! Stop running to your mommy!
It's kinda funny that the people who rage about the Citizens United decision can't grasp that when Democrats and Republicans work so diligently together their goal is to protect incumbents. It should have been called the McCain-Feingold Incumbent Protection Act.
Why do we let these eco-terrorists even live so far north where they have to burn up all the world's fuel? It's not like any of these people are actual lumberjacks who need to live there. They might as well be eating spotted owls on rye bread with mayo!