Re:That's just . . . . (Score 1)

Absolutely. In fact, Lauterbur suggested using NMR for imaging before Damadian did. Damadian's 1971 paper made no reference to imaging, but claimed to be able to identify cancerous tissue by relaxation time measurement -- a claim that has turned out to be incorrect except for a few special cases. A good summary is given in Donald P. Hollis's book Abusing Cancer Science (1987, ISBN 0942033159). Damadian's claim to deserve a Nobel Prize is, as far as I can see, utter nonsense.