Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Feed Canadians Overpay On Copying Levy -- Money 'Reimbursed' To Industry (techdirt.com)

As I'm sure many of you know, Canada has a "private copying levy," which is a fairly large tax on blank media, that is supposed to pay the content industry for the private, non-commercial copying that people do at home. Of course, some might note that private, non-commercial copying is the sort of thing that's legal fair use of content and shouldn't be charged for in the first place. Others might note that even with this tax, Canadians are told that it's illegal to share music online. It's all a bit of a mess. However, the truth is that it's free money for the industry, and they don't give up on that without a fight. Remember last year, when they came out with a ridiculous poll that actually suggested Canadians wanted to pay an even higher levy on blank CDs? The latest report is that the board that sets the fees wanted to raise them again, but actually agreed to keep some of the fees the same, while lowering some others. However, this resulted in a problem. The group realized that there's been a $2.5 million overpayment in the last three years. That is, consumers were charged $2.5 million more in these fees than they should have paid. The obvious solution is to give that money back to consumers in some manner... but instead, the group that manages the money plans to reimburse "importers and manufacturers." Yes, read that again. They're going to reimburse companies that didn't pay the fee and stiff those that did. How nice of them. Why do I get the feeling that these reimbursements won't find their way down the line to cheaper blank media prices?
Patents

Linus Responds To Microsoft Patent Claims 496

An anonymous reader writes "Linus Torvalds has a sharp retort to Microsoft executives' statements in a Fortune article that Linux violates 235 Microsoft patents. In an emailed response to InformationWeek's Charlie Babcock, Torvalds writes: 'It's certainly a lot more likely that Microsoft violates patents than Linux does.' He added: 'Basic operating system theory was pretty much done by the end of the 1960s. IBM probably owned thousand of really "fundamental" patents... The fundamental stuff... has long, long since lost any patent protection.'" Torvalds also commented on Microsoft's stated intention not to sue Linux users: "They'd have to name the patents then, and they're probably happier with the FUD than with any lawsuit."

Comment Re:Legality? (Score 1) 1035

Private discrimination is a different matter. I could keep black people, hispanic people, white people, blind left-handed people, or people who voted for Bush off of my private property simply because I wanted to. The government couldn't do anything about it.
A store may be private property but that doesn't mean that you can discriminate freely. I seem to recall during the civil rights era that blacks would enter restaurants or other businesses that refused to serve them and they eventually won. When you open a store to the public you are opening it to all the public.

Slashdot Top Deals

A method of solution is perfect if we can forsee from the start, and even prove, that following that method we shall attain our aim. -- Leibnitz

Working...