Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. ×

Comment Monthly subscription = one star review (Score 2) 50

I'm not even interested in using the app, but this kind of BS inspires the social justice warrior / idealist in me to go to Google play store and leave a one star review.

Some services, perhaps that include monthly changing content or might be too expensive to pay for outright, could be justified with a monthly subscription. This can't. Removing ads doesn't provide $2 worth of value per month.

Come with me. Who else wants to give an entitled anti-capitalism 1-star vote?

Or an ironic 5 star review?: MS, you cured my cancer! And let my 3 pet blind mice see again. So worth the $2 per month.

Comment Editors, please... (Score 1) 45

As already pointed out (+5 by sacrilicious), the TFS doesn't make sense. Why not update the summary with the missing line of the quote and include the disclaimer "EDIT: summary updated with full relevant quote".

Mistakes are human, but fixing them is an act of kindness to the readers that don't hit the site in the first wave.

Comment Re: This is kind of ridiculous... (Score 2) 236

You make fair points, but as devil's advocate...saying when something goes wrong and it gets in the news means there must be more going on that doesn't get in the news is the pessimist's perspective.

The flip side is, it's a big world. If I see murders and rapes on the news, it doesn't mean I necessarily need to be afraid in my own neighborhood.

So far, this kind of thing that Google has done hasn't affected me or my friends or my family. So one misunderstanding won't represent all of Google for all people.

Comment There already should be public backlash... (Score 4, Insightful) 412

There already should be public backlash against government surveillance, Trump or no Trump.

Because people (including government people) aren't good at keeping secrets and make too many assumptions.

There's no question in my mind that the US government spends too much money and other resources on this stuff. If Trump is the straw that breaks the camel's back and causes enough resentment to actually change something post-Trump then so be it.

Comment The less popular candidate wins again? (Score 1) 2837

Looks like Clinton had more voters in her favor and still loses. As happened when George W Bush won the presidency.

I'm not American, but if I lived in California, a landslide victory state in favour of Clinton, I would be disappointed that my vote doesn't really count. If I wanted Clinton to win and my State's already voting that way, I can't do anything to affect the balance of the closer tied states.

The USA is the country that talks about democracy the most, but the system is pretty far from a true democracy.

Sure, the votes were close, but I'm sure I could construct a scenario where a presidential candidate could get a large majority of votes, especially in the most populous states and still lose the election.

Comment FBI is a cult (Score 0) 134

... of somewhat crazy people that waste time and money. An overly powerful, overly funded cult. As with many cults, I don't think I would want to work with/for an organization that gets in the news for so many ridiculous things so often.

Hey America, why not vote for someone who's smart enough to do a cost-benefit analysis on the FBI and make changes? I don't know who, but it's probably not Trump or Clinton.

Comment Who's responsible? (Score 1) 432

FFS, they shouldn't be requesting this kind of warrant, and it shouldn't be issued. It's so obviously too broad and against human rights. Both the person who requested this warrant and the person that issued it should face repercussions, as should the feds overall for obstructing justice of the freedom of the people.

Comment Re:What will it look like 3 years later? (Score 1) 159

It's a fair post, but shouldn't have been modded up so high because it's factually unlikely to be a problem.

Apples and oranges. You can't compare wearing away paint with wearing away plastic.The layer of paint would be thin and raised too, compared to a thicker uniform plastic surface.

Modders please downvote the original post (with no disrespect to the poster) or upvote some of the replies.

Comment Musk's doing a dishonour to science.. (Score 1) 1042

... he's abusing his own fame to push his own unfounded beliefs. I wish he wouldn't try and quantify it by saying there's a very high probability we're in a simulation, a very low probability we're not. As a person in a scientific / engineering industry there's a chance he'll get people believing he knows what he's talking about. Especially people who distrust religion and want to believe that people in the scientific / technology fields are credible

He can't justify those numbers in any way

Being smart about something has no relation to being smart about everything, as we've seen with inventors, leaders and thinkers of the past that had beliefs outside their fields that are seen as outrageous today.

His argument... there are some beings that have humungous computing resources (why?how?assuming murphy's law extends forever?) that have been simulating what (a few generations of people? several billions of years of the whole universe? and why?). There are so many assumptions, it's ridiculous.

Slashdot Top Deals

Pascal is not a high-level language. -- Steven Feiner

Working...