Sorry, but who rated this asstrumpetry "Informative?"

I will respond in kind.

The poster states that they haven't bothered to read any of the application apart from the few bits they quoted. If you were to bother to read the full (or even significant portions of the) application, you would see that it is pretty clear.

You obviously no nothing about patent law. This is evidenced as much by you stating "or even significant portions" of the application. The significant portions of the application are the claims. Had you carefully read my earlier post, you would have read this. I write that after reading the claims, you should go back to figure out what the claim terms mean. I never gave meaning to the claim terms, nor did I attempt to interpret them. This is a task best left up to litigators and opinion writers.

So, please, until you've had the requisite training and experience to properly interpret claims, keep your opinions to yourself.

The views expressed herein are in no way associated with any private entity or government organization. None of the information contained herein should be construed as legal advice. If you need legal advice, please seek the advice of independent legal counsel.