Comment Re:Sounds familiar... (Score 4, Insightful) 216
Since fucking WHEN is Obama and Clinton left wing?????
You woldnt know a left leaning politcian if it bit you on the ass
Exactly. Less eloquently worded: Calling Democrats left shows a serious lack of historical and international perspective.
Comment Re:FACTUAL REPORTING (Score 2, Funny) 234
Comment Speaking as a public opinion poll... (Score 1) 320
Comment Re:Here it comes. (Score 2) 292
Third, it is trivially proven that there is no genuine consensus among scientists [climatedepot.com] that the warming is caused by humanity, or what to do about it. There is at best a preponderance of opinion among scientists that it is caused by humanity. It isn't necessarily clear how strongly those views are held.
From the link: "The well over 1,000 dissenting scientists are almost 20 times the number of UN scientists (52) who authored the media-hyped IPCC 2007 Summary for Policymakers."
Oh wow!!! LOL!
You can tell that the guy who wrote this was a producer for Rush Limbaugh's show.
Comment Re:Only 12345? (Score 1) 231
Hey, some of them did ---> Password list on Pastebin
Comment Re:ceiling cat/nyan cat (Score 1) 171
Comment Re:Positive sign (Score 1) 288
Comment Re:US to erect Great Atlantic Firewall (Score 1) 477
Yes, because there certainly is no need for anyone to be able to discuss the National Socialist Party or any recent revivals of same anywhere in Europe [...]
You can do that anywhere in Europe including Germany.
I don't even know what you're on about with Muhammad.
Try again?
Comment Re:Different thing (Score 1) 776
Come again?
Parent asked: BTW, what does tobacco have to do with this?
I pointed out that there is a connection (link to article showing that the same anti-science agenda think tanks which worked to discredit and obscure studies linking lung cancer to tobacco smoke exposure are now campaigning agains AGW).
How is this an ad hominem?
Comment Re:Different thing (Score 1) 776
BTW, what does tobacco have to do with this?
Comment Re:We're not there yet... (Score 1) 535
pro-AGW: $50 Billion, while the other side got skeptical of AGW: $19 Million.
There are links to references and such on that page. I think my work here is done.
Are you serious? Some industry-sponsored (Heartland Institute) aussie climate scientist pulled that number out of his ass (at least there is no telling where it came from).
Another funny from your link:
The U.S. alone has spent $30 billion on federal programs directly or indirectly related to global warming in just the last six years, according to one estimate.
The Bush administration, after all, is by far the largest funder of global warming alarmism, pouring about $30 billion of federal dollars into climate- and alternative energy-related research over the last six years.
LOL?
Comment Re:Sueing others for being copycats... (Score 1) 345
Please... Neither does this look "strikingly similiar", nor does it work anything like an iPad or Galaxy Tab.
Besides did a working version of this thing even exist? Because the device shown in that video is obviously a non-functioning dummy and whoever did the video sucks at editing. LOL!
Comment Re:Sueing others for being copycats... (Score 1) 345
Nokia N810: announced on October 17, 2007