Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop


Forgot your password?
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. ×

Comment Re:Total Trip Time (Score 1) 202

Ah, but if it runs on a "chartered" model, you don't have to wait in line and go through the security check & etc. Smaller airlines running small airplanes do this; the one time I used it I was surprised at the "Oh, you're here early, go ahead and board and we'll tell the tower we're ready once everyone is here."

Comment Re:$70K sounds pretty low (Score 1) 77

$70k gets the legislation into the system -- all that takes is one congresscritter, and yes they're that cheap. Then you have to lobby every committee member on every committee that reviews your legislation, to keep them from re-writing your bill into something you don't want, then you have to lobby enough to make it pass the first vote, then enough for the other half of Congress, including keeping any other committee from sabotaging your bill and enough votes to get passed and made into a law. Then you have to lobby the relevant enforcement agency, as well as possible state-level efforts depending on the bill and its arena of impact. The $70k is just the entry fee to the party, if you want to drink, that's extra.

Comment Habits for deep space? (Score 1) 88

I have to admit, I misread the title as "Habits" instead of "Habitats," which immediately made me wonder what those habits would be. Close the airlock behind you so the next person can get through seems obvious, as does being aware of the location of the nearest radiation shelters in the habitat in case of solar storms, and getting enough exercise to to avoid the dreaded bone and muscle loss. But habitats are cool too.

Comment Re:I don't see how this saves money (Score 1) 176

Seriously. The other day a limited access highway I use for my commute here in Virginia was shut down entirely in one direction, traffic sent on a detour through the local streets and traffic backed up for miles in both directions, due to someone's bike having fallen off a vehicle and landed in the road. There was a cop taking pictures, with dozens of those little evidence markers, a children's bike in the middle of the road, and several other cops blocking the road and redirecting traffic, for what should have been a "pick it up and let traffic move on" situation. During the evening rush hour, I should add.

Comment Re:You simply cannot be on Slashdot and be that du (Score 1) 185

Heck, I do blacksmithing and knifemaking for a hobby, and even that was impacted by the space program. My propane forge has insulation based on the space shuttle heat protection; the grinding belts I use were developed for making rocket and jet turbine blades, some of the steel I use came out of those programs, and the titanium I sometimes play with is only affordable because the aerospace industry uses enough that there's an economy of scale for production of Ti now.

Comment Re:So the farmer is merely renting the tractor? (Score 2) 639

Nope. If handed that ruling, the owners will declare bankruptcy, re-incorporate, sell their companies back to each other, and then claim that this new fictitious corporate person they've transferred the profits to has nothing to do with the company that has the liability and responsibility to repair stuff. It's how all the major corporations divested themselves of their pension obligations, and how corporations in general treat any toxic "asset" that costs them more than they want to pay out on. The only just solution is to make them open up the codes and repair processes.

Comment Re: It's a liability issue (Score 2) 451

Also, the Asimov stories were, at their heart, about smart people doing clever things to prevent disaster before it happens. Hollywood doesn't like thinking, hates smart people, and is all about the disasters actually happening so they can get butts in seats to sell tickets. The average movie goer likes explosions, mass casualties, and easy explanations. People being clever just pisses them off by reminding them how stupid they are. Now, you could take the Asimov three-laws stories, twist them a bit, and make them all explody and flashy, but they would still fail at the box office because the audience can't relate to the protagonists. It's why I despair of a decent adaption of many of the great books out there: the great stories just aren't emotional enough to get made into a movie, let alone have a decent budget. Producers will grab a title, maybe some plot elements, and then force it into a mold and squeeze until everything that made the story great is gone, leaving something that to them, who have never read the original and who wouldn't understand it if they did, looks like something that will put butts in seats to sell tickets. And then they wonder why it bombed, and vow to never try again.

Comment Re:Getting to a technological level is hard. (Score 1) 559

"You can't melt iron with wood fires." Actually, the first fuels used to smelt iron and other metals was wood -- charcoal to be precise. Still used by hobbyists and re-enactors who want to recreate the iron available to the earliest smiths. A lot of forests have been chopped down over the centuries to make iron.

Comment Weren't lasers banned? (Score 1) 208

I believe there was an issue with laser-based weapons back when a tank-based laser targeting system was determined to be in violation of certain warfighting conventions in regards to blinding weapons. I supposed on the proposed air-to-air platforms it isn't much of an issue, but there would seem to be an issue with air-to-ground use, as it would be trivial to use a 1-megajoule laser to blind anyone in a large area who was looking in the wrong direction at the wrong time. Probably moot as the platform is air-to-air from the description, and probably less effective in real life than chemical explosion propelled metal, but it wouldn't surprise me if the technology got shelved over such concerns.

Comment Re:Don't engineer near the limits. (Score 1) 139

One of the rules in engineering is that you really shouldn't engineer near the limits of your materials. For instance a modern day hammer is so well below what can easily be made with steel and wood that we don't worry about its reliability; even a 50% reduction in strength because of a flaw would still give you a pretty useful hammer, or if the person wielding the hammer is unusually strong, still not a problem.

As a blacksmith, I will point out that I have had many a hammer break on me: not just Chinese recast engine blocks on whatever scrapwood they could handle it with, but name-brand hammers that should have had better quality control. I'm not even particularly strong, but for heavy forging work or repetitive striking of hardened steel tools will take a toll eventually, and some are flawed right out of the box with hidden cracks in the handle or an improper heat-treatiment of the head, or once a beautiful handmade hammer had an issue with the wedge, also handmade, not being properly applied, allowing the head to go flying off after a few uses. Engineering a hammer isn't hard, but don't assume that because it's just a lump of metal on a stick that it's impossible to mess up.

Comment Re:Meanwhile my phone crashes about once a month.. (Score 1) 265

Exactly. Situations humans find easy will sometimes be hard for software to recognize -- a human directing traffic is a great example, or when a construction crew puts up cones but not a clear indication of which side of the cones are going to be worked on, as well as other similar temporary markings. Traffic lights with a burnt-out bulb, or a stuck sensor that won't turn your lane green, old lane markings never properly cleared off before new ones were in place, or even just parking in the right place when a friend is having a party and all the regular spaces in their driveway are taken up. Driving off-road where there are no roads to follow (Sure, you'd drive yourself for fun if we're talking duen-buggies and desert sands, but not so much when trying to get to a remote herd on a large ranch.) Even things like snow, ice, and really hard rain shouldn't faze a robust driving system, but a poorly-marked detour through a parking lot like I had to take this morning? Those will probably need human intervention or similar for a while, though I doubt it will take long for even the extreme edge cases to be covered.

Comment Re:If something does go wrong (Score 1) 264

A big problem with the perception of cars unable to deal with snow/ice is that a lot of people leave all their traction control gizmos on even in slick conditions, and the car just won't move. This is because at least elements of traction control systems need to be turned off in some situations, something an auto-driving car is well aware of and presumably just bypasses when its driving in such conditions. I've seen cars abandoned in the middle of a 4-lane highway on a gentle slope because they didn't know that all they had to do was hit the button to turn off that feature.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Consider a spherical bear, in simple harmonic motion..." -- Professor in the UCB physics department