
Isn't it the robots who will produce the useful stuff? Maybe the robots should be taxed. That is, tax the owners of robots who have lower labor costs because they don't hire workers. Seems fair to me that the owners of robots should give up part of the increased profits they realize by replacing workers with robots.
Thank you Mr. Keynes. You're correct, by the way. Seriously, you've made his argument clear. Good post.
Oh, I see. You want to modify the cookie not just delete it. I'm running Firefox. I can see a cookies.sqlite file in %APPDATA%\Mozilla\Firefox\Profiles\. Perhaps an sqlite editor like the one at http://sqlitebrowser.org/ would allow you to edit values. Sorry, I'm not very familiar with sqlite files.
CCleaner provides a cookie editor under Options, Cookies. At the screen that opens you can right click a listed cookie and then click Delete now. Is that what you had in mind?
>First problem is where does the money come from?
Part of the money comes from reduced cost of administration compared to welfare, unemployment, etc. For some of the rest, why not tax those who cause the problem and benefit from it? That is, tax the robots (actually the owners of the robots). The robot owners realize an enhanced profit from reduced employee expenses. Maybe a fraction of the increased profit due to each robot could go toward funding a basic income for all. The robot owner would still get a larger profit compared to hiring a person but not all the benefit accrues to him. The robot owner must pay some part of the social cost of replacing workers with machines. Does that seem fair?
I think you're saying almost the same thing as I am but a general increase in corporate taxes penalizes some who aren't really causing the problem.
He's not just an actor, he's a golden-tongued living deity with powers far beyond the mere superhuman. Proof abounds in these Amazon reviews of his finest work: http://www.amazon.com/Very-Bes...
Not so, I think. Read up on spread spectrum communications. My understanding is that spread spectrum techniques make it almost impossible to distinguish signal from noise.
I'm not sure how well known it is but there is "God Mode" for Win 7, 8, and 10. To get God Mode you create a folder on the desktop and rename it as described below:
1. Go to the Desktop
2. Right-click and select New Folder.
3. Right-click on the New Folder and select Rename.
4. Change the name of the folder [just copy & paste the following string]: GodMode.{ED7BA470-8E54-465E-825C-99712043E01C}
5. Open the folder and you will find every setting/utility under the sun organized into a sensible menu that you can browse through without knowing what name to type into a search bar.
I don't want to spread bad information about the free Win 10 installation but some posts that I've read say that once you convert from Win 7 to 10, you get a new key and your original Win 7 license is invalidated. That is, once you convert to Win 10, if you don't like it you can't reinstall Win 7. Is this true? I hope not.
I was in my 20's and living in Boston in the 1970's where a few UHF broadcast stations were transmitting on-air scrambled pron. They scrambled the signal by reducing the amplitude of the horizontal sync signal. I built a circuit using a 4046 CMOS phase locked loop that re-injected the missing sync signal at the proper time. Lots of trouble for some early mild videos. Sad material compared to today. Little did I realize how much technology would advance in this important area in subsequent years.
If programming is like math (and I think it is in some ways) then the distribution of talent may very well be U shaped. There seems to be a few extremely talented mathematicians like Gauss, Euler, Cantor, Godel, Ramanujan, etc. and then everyone else. That doesn't mean that those like me near the bottom of the U can't appreciate and follow what those at the top accomplish but I think the nervous systems of those who can think so clearly about math are wired in a different way. Maybe so with programmers too.
Sounds like you don't do anything serious with a computer.
I bought a new machine with Win 8.1 (ugh) on it from Dell last week with plans to put OEM Win 7 on it. Dell said I could do that if I was willing to give up support and that was ok with me. To my surprise, when the machine arrived it had no license key sticker on it at all so I couldn't use a general OEM install program like the ones from Digital River. Luckily I had a Dell OEM Win 7 install disc from another machine and that installed and activated ok using the key stored in the bios. Is this a new trend that machines now come without a key sticker? Should I call Dell and insist on a Microsoft key?
"I've seen the forgeries I've sent out." -- John F. Haugh II (jfh@rpp386.Dallas.TX.US), about forging net news articles