It's irritating to me that the word "adversary" has started being used to mean "attacker". They are not the same thing. An adversary is an idealized opponent with certain well-defined capabilities often seen in cryptographic proofs or threat models. It's not the same as an attacker, which is a concrete person, or group of persons, having attacked a system or is currently in the process of doing so.

So, what is it then? Spelunking?

Year of Wayland on Linux was ages ago.

To be fair, no one comes to slashdot for the freshest news.

I don't think we need to hear this condescending lecturing about causation and correlation for the billionth time, but thank you.

Semantic versioning schemes are mostly pointless ceremony for feigning engineering rigor.

I think that's how it should work in many situations. Iterating on code is not strictly necessary when you have agents that can reason about and output thousands of lines of code in minutes. Any new requirement has the potential to result in architecture-breaking changes that may be best solved through a complete rewrite. What happens with the code in the implementation may not, in a completely spec-driven scenario, be relevant at all assuming no human developers are expected to work on it.

And you're basing this assumption off what exactly? Have you even seen what Tesla FSD is currently capable of?

No. That would be a very inadequate way of describing what was actually a targeted supply-chain attack.

Skill issue.

I am forced to use Windows at work. Is it too much to ask that it's not a buggy piece of shit?

And this prediction is based on...?

Why would you hunt for AI generated articles? The future of encyclopedias is for them to be mostly managed by AIs, with the occasional human interference and quality control.

No problem. We'll just use AI to dig through the mountain of shit.

I am not sure what you're referring to, but the bizarre self-censoring of even mildly offensive words like "suicide" and "prostitute" on Youtube is getting to a point where it's almost comical. I am not sure if this is a result of actual rules that Youtube enforces, or if it's creator paranoia.