I think that's how it should work in many situations. Iterating on code is not strictly necessary when you have agents that can reason about and output thousands of lines of code in minutes. Any new requirement has the potential to result in architecture-breaking changes that may be best solved through a complete rewrite. What happens with the code in the implementation may not, in a completely spec-driven scenario, be relevant at all assuming no human developers are expected to work on it.

And you're basing this assumption off what exactly? Have you even seen what Tesla FSD is currently capable of?

No. That would be a very inadequate way of describing what was actually a targeted supply-chain attack.

Skill issue.

I am forced to use Windows at work. Is it too much to ask that it's not a buggy piece of shit?

And this prediction is based on...?

Why would you hunt for AI generated articles? The future of encyclopedias is for them to be mostly managed by AIs, with the occasional human interference and quality control.

No problem. We'll just use AI to dig through the mountain of shit.

I am not sure what you're referring to, but the bizarre self-censoring of even mildly offensive words like "suicide" and "prostitute" on Youtube is getting to a point where it's almost comical. I am not sure if this is a result of actual rules that Youtube enforces, or if it's creator paranoia.

Whitespace pedantry is a scourge of modern software development.

m-maybe

You're missing the important question: Can I send messages by writing with my own pee in the snow?

An increase in demand could encourage the creation of new local infrastructure that could lead to lower electricity prices in the long run. While I am not trying to defend the obvious datacenter propaganda, it is important to point out that the economy is like a dynamical system, and things are not always as straightforward as readily assumed.

We are so used to the constraints put on us by IPv4 that we don't even consider what opportunities open up when every single device on the planet has its own globally routed IP address. It's like an abusive relationship. Not all service resolution works on name based principles, nor is it necessarily the best way in all cases (for example in P2P scenarios). Overlay networks, NAT and private addressing are often not really desirable nor strictly necessary, and this fact should affect how we reason about a future internet.

Paying trash for photos? What is this? OnlyFans?