Yeah the second link in the summary says they got Zhi's offline wallets and private keys that "were in his possession". But it is not clear if FBI and 'partner' orgs simply sent Alphabet a National Security Letter so they could snoop through Zhi's gmail/gdrive files, or if they hacked his phone, or if an actual physical raid ever took place.

Because Zhi is not in custody, and the same second link doesnt say anything about anyone going into a home or compound *and instead* alleges Zhi 'maintained documents describing and depicting "phone farms"' kind of makes it sound like no one ever went to Cambodia and Google just let them into his gdrive, etc. https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr...

Is there a difference between msmash showing us posts from some personal blog, versus posts from a news site that's owned by the "journalist" and the owner is the only person that ever posts on the news site?

Asking for a friend. (and that friend is: BrianFagioli https://m.slashdot.org/profile...)

Seriously? No, the cases still happen -technically- both in your post and DT's rhetoric. Not hard to understand - whether you measure or not illness still occurs, disease transmits. Same goes for ocean chemistry or forest fires.

The last line of the post you typed is *actually* just saying the boring claim: "If we stop testing we'll know about fewer cases"

No, 'print release' by PIN is extremely common and not usually done through 3rd party software. Click and enter the PIN in your OS print dialog and then printer holds onto the job until someone comes and scrolls the 'pending' jobs list and enters the right PIN. Literally a common eorkplace feature for 20 years, Microsoft OS calls it 'Secure Print'.

Not sure about other poster's random Brother but mine also more of a light duty prosumer/SOHO model that lacks a keypad, alphanumeric info is entered one character at a time via the up/down/enter/back keys.

lol thing that screams at me is that 'forensic tool' image has obviously had the IPs removed for privacy. "[redacted]", "[raspberry_pi]", and "[mail_server]" all are clearly placeholders put in for publication are not 3x actual hostnames the researchers found on the bank network.

You know the NNSA also has a lot of unclassified documents, right? Sure, even unclassified stuff can be sensitive, but what gave you the impression there was any classified data on the public-internet-connected Sharepoint server?

As for ranting about foreign nationals.. what makes you think NNSA did not follow their strict policies about how/when foreign nationals are provided access to classified files (are you a military rep from France or UK who has treaty agreement rights to benefit from weapons data? are you a collaborating academic from an approved country participating in a legit project with approved need-to-know? etc.)

I don't know, I currently have a project running Go code in Python via Wasmtime and the experience with WASM is very shit. Headache is so bad, it almost would have been worth porting the entire Go tool to Python.

For every one typo the compiler catches in my library adapter Go code (already more annoying than Python which has excellent exceptions, hints, & no compile step just edit and rerun vs scrolling the nearly unreadable WASM build failure log)... there are literally 10x runtime errors from data inputs with somehow an even more useless stack-trace and error output. I just give up and rerun the inputs through the native Go. Seriously bad real-world dev experience.

Bingo. Yeah, background checks literally just search credit files/lexisNexis which in turn are just collections of cheap available lists.

Next most likely option, the h1b applied for a credit card using that address or gave it to their employer for payrole who then turned around and rented it out to ADT or anyone with two nickels to rub together that asked

Wait. Titanfall *had* a single-player mode?

I remember buying it new way back for 360, playing multiplayer for maybe a month (fun for sure, but pretty repetitive after two weeks or so), and then resold the disc for someone else to enjoy. Literally do not even remember seeing a 'story mode' menu option.

Among technical people many, if not most did choose. Chrome launched during a period when Firefox had stumbled and started to bloat with features and memory usage. It started with tech folk intentionally using chrome for personal browsing until mindshare was so great around maybe 2012 that people stopped testing web content on Firefox and just built things for chrome.

Because microsoft functionally had a monopoly on the OS used on essentially every single citizen's computer at the time and was convicted in court of the same.

If Google's functional monopoly on ad sales and search is as bad (OS is viewed as more difficult for a citizen to 'switch' from, vs browser or web search engine less so) is still up for debate.

Because copyright law. If someone gives you their copywritten item you abide the terms of their licensing, else forfeit right to their work (subject to fair-use). If you do not have any right to a work (or have lost a previously granted right), you certainly cannot create modified versions to distribute to further parties.

AGPLv3 the license does not protect itself .. it protects the use of some other creative work.

Yeah I agree. These defendants really need a lawyer. Crucially, Neo4j corp did not receive AGPLv3 licensed code from someone else and then try to relicense that. Instead Neo4j holds copyright on entire project & has been very careful to require any contributors sign a Contributor License Agreement that doesnt assign copyright to the corp, but does establish 'joint' copyright.

https://neo4j.com/developer/cl... They even have a special revised CLA for IBM employees to sign before sending in PRs https://dev.assets.neo4j.com/w...

Indeed, as you say, by holding full copyright they can dual license or freely relicense new versions of the project at-will. If anything, these forkers should be going after any weaknesses in that CLA and contesting if neo4j really can do whatever they want with only joint copyright (assuming the forkers are also contributors). Otherwise they should respect the copyright holder and only build their forks off the AGPLv3 Neo4j Community Edition, any features they added themselves, and not appropriate any of these non-free "Enterprise Edition" code releases.

Um, did you even read that link? It says US wanted peace negotiation, Trump mouthpiece wanted victory through war.

Seriously amazing. Link clearly spells out that US thought peace was not being negotiated realistically (Demanding Putin step down) and so US encouraged that condition to be dropped so fighting would not continue & negotiation could succeed.
It then ends with a Trump spokesperson (get this: uneducated, unrealistic and inconsistent), claiming US is wrong to push for better negotiation and should only push to win through military victory.

Amazing how Musk and team trip and stumble in thrashing confusion, over a table of data Senator Ron Johnson explained coherently and easily ten years ago in one paragraph. https://www.ronjohnson.senate....