Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Irresponsible (Score 1) 363

I'm a little disappointed in slashdot's editors for posting this. It's speculation that has nothing to do with any reality that we know. It's like a banner headline on a newspaper reading "Apple could possibly buy Verizon" or "Pfizer has ability to buy Home Depot" - yes, possibly true, and yes, it's ever so slightly more possible than it would have been a few years ago.

The difference is - slightly more possible. NOT AT ALL PROBABLE.

I'm not trolling, it's just that this kind of headline on slashdot has such little value; I'm sure it's not THAT slow a news day.

Comment Re:They did not re-issue a new patch! (Score 2, Informative) 226

Wrong! From the microsoft patch site:

  • V1.0 (March 9, 2004): Bulletin published
  • V2.0 (March 10, 2004): Bulletin updated to reflect on a revised severity rating of Critical and to advise of a new client update.
  • V2.1 (March 10, 2004): Frequently Asked Question "What is the scope of the vulnerability?" updated.

Slashdot Top Deals

"It ain't so much the things we don't know that get us in trouble. It's the things we know that ain't so." -- Artemus Ward aka Charles Farrar Brown

Working...