And blatant cowardly behind the scenes overt censorship even faster.

Thanks for the adds.

I go not by "what they say about themselves", but the actual power structure.

You imagine there is something fundamentally different about entitling oneself to steal and kill en masse for "the volk", or "the proletariat", or the "underserved".

There isn't. Hitler and Stalin are the same guy in different clothes, and they are what socialism always trends toward.

"What's the difference between socialism and communism and Naziism? Well, how much have I gotten away with so far?"

You're so ignorant of history you don't know what the NSDAP stands for, and means?

Such an ignorant child. Of course you need to suck off your betters for everything, and have government coddle you your entire existence.

Yes, and you're "doing great" after WW2 because of the Marshall Plan, courtesy the U.S., and capitalism, saving you from the catastrophe of Socialism of the German National Socialist variety.

You're supposed to eventually stop needing other people's money, though. You going to get around to that eventually?

Get off the babysitter, daddy's home.

Let it not be said I don't follow through.

Well, yes, I did specify ley lines in the search.

No idea, but they apparently have some Republican ideas, so I'm going full guilt-by-association.

Probably works on Democrats, too. Guessing a search for "Quaalude & Democrat" will give a roster including Ley lines or chakra crystals or somesuch, free to choose from. Facebook has the full rhetorical buffet at your fingertips.

You're neglecting the lifelong trauma of the perhaps thousands of people who had to endure the personal horror of clicking "unfriend".

Whenever my opponent has a good point, I search Facebook for an overtly crazy group that -also- believes that point.

Easy wins. Thanks Facebook.

China: TikTok!

U.S.: Tick, tock.

I empathize with your point, but Not The First Man sounds equally celebratory.

Wiki.

Yes...

Nice numerical co-incidence on the userid. Reminds me of someone.

The Internet of Things includes people, naturally.

Do they get to choose whose devices they are?

So, you are agreeing it's arbitrary, while saying it isn't.

Don't feel bad, you're not the first person to be disconcerted when having thought they are standing on bedrock "proven scientific fact", they find they are standing on airy nothing.

What a species is, is a philosophical question, not one of science, much less of "fact". The suggested Wikipedia entry as the top hit for "Species Problem" will elaborate as extensively as you could desire.

Categorical conventions are not "true", they are "useful". Common error.