Re:Cool, but aren't there better ways? (Score 1)

Remember that your eye only sees what it
focuses on and the amount of light that
is focused is only a small portion of the
light emitted.. The problem is finding
ways to emit the light directly into the eye
and precisely, quickly and according to what its focuses at.. I think it would be much easier to do a form of additive reality, where the image
coexists with you in your present reality,
kind of like where a pair of glasses with the
images overlayed on your current view of the world.. The problem with polarized views is
the 3D image doesn't really jump out at you, it exists somewhere into the screen
past your reach.. That image has to be in your face to seem like its real and it has to be of plenty of resolution.. It also doesn't
look real unless you can see things of your reality also about you.. So 1280x1024 screen
on each eye with some kind of subtle fuzziness
(optimizing the display according to where you are eye looking).. These technologies exist but probably not at that resolution, its just a matter of fine tuning them.. The viewing field would probably also have to be curved like the
shape of the eye..

Has anyone thought of video contacts?
How hard would that be?? Probably a bad idea,
people would forget to take them off..