Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. ×

Submission + - Obama used a pseudonym in emails with Clinton, FBI documents reveal (politico.com)

schwit1 writes: President Barack Obama used a pseudonym in email communications with Hillary Clinton and others, according to FBI records made public Friday. The disclosure came as the FBI released its second batch of documents from its investigation into Clinton’s private email server during her tenure as secretary of state.

The 189 pages the bureau released includes interviews with some of Clinton’s closest aides, such as Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills; senior State Department officials; and even Marcel Lazar, better known as the Romanian hacker “Guccifer.”

In an April 5, 2016 interview with the FBI, Abedin was shown an email exchange between Clinton and Obama, but the longtime Clinton aide did not recognize the name of the sender.

"Once informed that the sender's name is believed to be pseudonym used by the president, Abedin exclaimed: 'How is this not classified?'" the report says. "Abedin then expressed her amazement at the president's use of a pseudonym and asked if she could have a copy of the email."

Comment Re:Johnson and anti-incumbent (Score 2) 382

@AC Thanks for this info. I didn't know you can easily review wiki history. I confirmed it by plugging the wiki info into https://voterlookup.elections.... Looks like "Honestmedia" has been busy.
@niaxilin If there is a way to edit my post, I'll gladly remove that paragraph. I was only reporting on my observations, which at least have been confirmed.

Comment Re:Johnson and anti-incumbent (Score 5, Informative) 382

Keep in mind that Trump is not exactly the darling of the Republican party. They did everything imaginable to try and keep him from winning the primaries. I think he is only polling at 70% within the party, and many of the party establishment say that they are not endorsing him. Even Bush Sr has come out and said he is voting for Hillary.

To me, this election is not D vs R, but more of like Establishment vs Outsider. Trump could have run as a candidate for either party, and there would be the same drumbeat as to how bad/evil/stupid he is.

Sorry to get off-topic. But yesterday I did a quick Yahoo search "What is Lester Holt's political affiliation". I use Yahoo for any politics-related searches. Trump is being bashed for saying Holt (who will moderate the debate) is a democrat. The Yahoo page still had cached Wikipedia text that says "According to voter registration records, he is a Democrat". So, I saved a screen snapshot. But when you follow the link to the Wiki page, that text is now gone. At the bottom of the page, it says Holt is a Republican. But they only cite two articles, created yesterday, that bash Trump's statement, and use that as reference rather than voter registration records. Over the last day, they altered reality to fit the story that Trump is stupid/wrong. And if anyone tries a quick "fact check", they will hit up Wikipedia, which now contains bogus information and a circular reference. No doubt that by now, other places like answers.com have also been "updated".

Comment Re: This explains it all (Score 1) 395

From TFSummary, you cannot turn off tracking for Google Play or Google Maps. Google always knows where you are, and offers that information to installed apps.

"Don't be evil" is so last-decade. According to Larry Page, the "Don't be evil" culture prohibited conflicts of interest, and required objectivity and an absence of bias. This does not apply to Alphabet. https://sputniknews.com/us/201...

Comment Re:Stop the paranoia, please (Score 3, Insightful) 127

The difference is that with AC, there is no way to correlate posts and put a person's statement in context. It is impossible to know if this is someone that is always rude, calling people names just because they disagree without any counter-argument - or if this a person who actually adds some thoughtful insight to a topic. There is also no way to know if this is a shill, or if this person has a particular axe to grind. There is also no way to know if someone makes a statement and then follows up with a bunch of others agreeing with their own post.

That said, I do agree with the premise of your question. You don't know who I am. But at least you can look at my other posts and get an idea whether I am trying to make a serious point or just being a jerk or shill.

I am a moderator on a different forum - one that requires full real names. It is amazing how thoughtful and polite people are when they have to personally stand behind the statements they make.

Comment Re:Energy storage is expensive (Score 1) 149

No, 10 cents per *amortized* KWH is correct.

My system has 4 Surrette 6CS-25PS. About 28-30 KWH total storage, stored at 24v.

Those batteries cost about $1100 each, depending where you buy them. 6v, 1158 AH (20 hour rate)

So, without splitting hairs on load rates and voltage, $1100/(6x1.156) = $159/KWH

But when amortized against the rated 3300 cycles to 50%: $159 / 3300 / .5 = $0.096 per KWH to store your energy. Again, I've done a lot of research, and that's the best I could come up with.

Amortized cost is the number you need to look at when pricing a system.

Comment Re:Energy storage is expensive (Score 1) 149

Your cells are the cheaper ones. Rolls specs say 3300 cycles for Series-5000 cells.

"5000 series is no-compromise solution for extended use. Dual container construction, 10 year limited warranty. Rated for 5000 cycles at 20% depth of discharge. 3300 cycles at 50%. Capacities are listed at 100 Hr. rate." http://www.cosolar.com/catalog...

They are designed for a 15 year lifespan. Mine are still nearly good as new after 10 years.

Comment Energy storage is expensive (Score 5, Informative) 149

Sorry, I don't have time this morning to glean exact numbers. But there is a misconception that energy storage is free. I just went through these calculations for my off-grid dream home. (My cabin has been off-grid for 20+ years, so I am intimately familiar with wind+solar+storage.)

In reality, batteries don't last forever. The best of the best Rolls/Surette sealed lead acid batteries are good for 3,300 discharges to 50%. So, when you calculate the cost of those batteries against their total number of KWH that they will EVER store, it works out to approximately 10 cents per KWH. I've looked at every option available, and there are no other options close to flood lead acid storage amortized price.

According to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... the Tesla powerwall has/had projected cycle life of 1000–1500 cycles. On a cost per KWH of new battery, they are about 3x the cost of flooded lead acid. So, for 3x the price, you get about half the energy storage over their lifespan. Again, apologies for not presenting the arithmetic. But the stored energy will cost somewhere between 30-50 cents per KWH. So, it is already not competitive with on-demand generation - even if the cost of generation is zero.

Comment Re:Nice way to try and destroy Apple's image (Score 5, Funny) 255

Basically some hacker found that they could hook a device up the phones innards and just try brute forcing the 4-digit PIN and that if they cut all power to the device on a failed attempt quickly enough that the system wouldn't register the failed attempt and wipe the device.

But that would void the warranty.

Slashdot Top Deals

In every hierarchy the cream rises until it sours. -- Dr. Laurence J. Peter

Working...