I don't see how a constantly updating Windows is much worse than a constantly updating Ubuntu?
With a decent internet connection a Ubuntu update completes in under a minute in most cases. Then that's it. If a kernel upgrade was applied a polite reminder to reboot your computer pops up, but no rude forced reboot. Also there is no 10+ minutes of updates being installed "do not turn off computer" BS once you try to shut down the PC.
I don't use Ubuntu, so can't speak to that. But none of my Linux boxen require me to constantly update anything whatsoever.
The timing of this post on the front page is a little too timely. The prime minister Kevin Rudd today announced the date the federal election is to be held. It will be September 7th. Me thinks the poster is quite possibly a card carrying Australian Labor Party (ALP) member.
There seems to be a lot of scaremongering going on in regards to the Liberal National coalition's NBN policy. The ALP is promising fibre to the building in all cases except for where it is completely infeasible (e.g. remote towns out in the desert etc.). Sounds great but it will be expensive. Probably somewhere well over $50 billion. The coalition is promising fibre to the node with fibre to the building available at cost to the user for those that need it. Coalition's will be a fair bit cheaper as it won't be funding fibre to every building.
The Liberal National coalition's NBN policy page
Debate over which of the two policies is superior is healthy but blatant biased scaremongering is not.
Yes, I used xeyes.
That is not a live tile. When you clicked xeyes, it didn't launch a program. xeyes didn't tell you anything (the weather, sports scores, etc.), other than the direction the mouse pointer was relative to the xeyes.
Windowmaker dockapps did this well over a decade ago.
Neither is a 1366x768 glare screen. It is outright offensive.
It has a 1600x900 matte screen.
Interchangeable parts won't.