Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror
Music

Walmart Caves On DRM Removal 215

Posted by kdawson from the just-kidding dept.
cmunic8r99 writes in with an email he received from walmart.com yesterday evening about the pending shutdown of their DRM services (which we discussed a while back). Walmart has reconsidered and won't be shutting off its DRM servers after all. They are still moving to an all-MP3 store, but won't break all the DRMed music its customers have already downloaded; this because of "feedback from the customers."
Encryption

First Secure Quantum Crypto Network Up and Running 102

Posted by timothy from the all-new-perfect-forever-place-your-bets dept.
John Lam was one of many readers to send in news that on Thursday, "at a conference in Vienna, Austria, as reported by the BBC, a European Community science working group built a quantum backbone using 200-km of standard commercial optical fiber running among seven sites and successfully demonstrated the first secure quantum cryptographic key distribution network. In addition, each of the seven links used a different kind of quantum encryption, demonstrating interoperability between the technologies. To paraphrase, the project focused on the trusted repeater paradigm and developed an architecture allowing seamless integration of heterogeneous quantum-key distribution-link devices in a unified framework. Network node-modules managing all classical communication tasks provide the underlying quantum devices with authentic classical channels. The node-module architecture uses a layered model to provision network-wide, end-to-end, provably secure key distribution."
Security

US Financial Quagmire Bringing Out the Scammers 272

Posted by timothy from the brother-where-is-your-empathy? dept.
coondoggie contributes this snippet from NetworkWorld: "You could probably see this one coming. With all of the confusion and money involved you knew there would be cyber-vultures out there looking to cash in. Well the Federal Trade Commission today issued a warning that indeed such increased phishing activities are taking place. Specifically the FTC said it was urging user caution regarding e-mails that look as if they come from a financial institution that recently acquired a consumer's bank, savings and loan, or mortgage. In many case such emails are only looking to obtain personal information — account numbers, passwords, Social Security numbers — to run up bills or commit other crimes in a consumer's name, the FTC stated."
United States

Permanent Links For US Legislation Documents 42

Posted by timothy from the get-crackin'-blue-book-kids dept.
dizzymslizzy writes "With prompting from the Sunlight Foundation's Open House Project, the US Library of Congress announced today that its online database THOMAS will now generate persistent URLs, known as legislative handles, for legislation documents. As Free Government Info says, 'it is certainly nice to be able to link to legislation with a persistent link! But it would be much better if one could click to create a link rather than following a 600-word description of how to link on another page.' Still, this is a definite step forward for the Library of Congress and for government transparency. From THOMAS: 'Legislative Handles are a new persistent URL service for creating links to legislative documents from the THOMAS web site (http://thomas.loc.gov). With a simple syntax, Legislative Handles make it easy to type in legislative links to bibliographies, reference guides, emails, blogs, or web pages. Legislative Handles, for instance, http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.uscongress/legislation.110hconres196, are a convenient way to cite legislation.'

Comment Re:Correction (Score 0, Troll) 953

by bigjohna (#15079662) Attached to: Prof Denied Funds Over Evolution Evidence
Since when is a Judge in any way qualified to rule on science? What if that had happened with Einstein or Maxwell? Darwin has been overplayed, if you read Origin of Spicies you can see that it is a theory and there are plenty of inconsistencies, Intelligent Design is something that is another theory. I am not claiming that either is correct, however, having read Darwin, the proponents intelligent design, and the Judge's opinion. The way science develops is through the proposition of theories and lots of work required in proving one superior to the other. Sometimes neither one is able to get the upper hand (e.g. Physics). What Judge Jones did was really censorship more than anything. If science is to be determined by the courts, then our civilization is truly in for it.

Slashdot Top Deals

On the eighth day, God created FORTRAN.

Close