"Have you looked at a vanilla install of Firefox? Compare that with Opera and the number of features in Firefox is pretty much approaching zero."
This actually describes why I use Firefox.
Uh, sure, I agree... but can you see through your phone with your eyes like the insightful comment I replied to seems to claim?
Really? You can see through your phone with your eyes??? Maybe I need to upgrade mine, think there is an app for that?
Those are numbers based on a keynote speech and are full of assumptions. Pretty much each number comes with a "assumed" or "suggests." Anywhere you have seen real numbers and not ones made up based on somethine steve jobs said in a keynote? Not to be rude or anything but Steve Jobs has basically been caught on more than one occasion of, how should we say.... bending the truth.
I used to use the YouTube one... I no longer have an iPhone... but the YouTube web app was actually better than the built in YouTube app in my opinion. Also, as far as I know, WebApps aren't the only use of the embeded WebUI thingy... you use that in actual apps the get browser functionality. If you haven't noticed HTML in any of your apps you aren't looking very hard.
If you look at the actual numbers, you will see that the AppStore is a break-even affair for Apple.
How does one go about doing this? Everything I have read has been speculation. As far as I can tell, no numbers have actually been released.
What they were saying is developing apps with html rendering gives you a much faster rendering in Android when compared to the iPhone. This is kind of a big deal if you ask me... a lot of apps I use clearly are rendering HTML with what I assume are these very rendering engines that were tested.
If you had a nickle for every person in the US you would only have between 15 and 16 million dollars. Bill Gates is worth quite a bit more than that. Even if everyone in the US asked you multiple time you still wouldn't be all that close to being as rich as Bill gates. Even if they all gave you a dollar... twice... uhm yeah... still pretty far away. Bill Gates has a lot of money.
"Would some of us like to see it more popular than, say, Flash to serve up video?"
Read what you are responding to. They don't say flash is the codec used, they say that flash is what is used to serve up the video content. What they are saying is embed and object tags containing flash files, which may or may not contain H.264 encoded video, are used to deliver the video content instead of a straight video tag. Firefox can handle this just fine. While youtube briefly attempted to switch to the straight video tag they have gone back to serving up their videos in flash files. If the world were using the video tag to serve up video, then, and only then, would Firefox have an issue with not being able to render H.264 encoded videos.
"To suggest it's the most adopted is wishful thinking."
Is absolutely correct. Please notice, again the word codec is not in this statement. They are simply stating that the internet at large is serving its video files with flash, not with html5 video tags.
That is an odd comparison, saying you can't run an ad network on the PS3 or Wii. A better comparison would be saying that Sony or Nintendo prevent you from using whatever ad network you want in the games you sell for their platform. As far as I know, they do not prevent such a thing. That is why the iPhone is being singled out here.
But... they didn't tell you first... they released the iphone... people went out and bought the iphone... developers started building applications for the iphone... then adobe decided to make something that allowed you to convert flash apps to said iphone OS... THEN apple said no you can't do that. It isn't just adobe either... there are other development platforms affected here.
What if I bought an iphone JUST so I could build apps in Mono for it? Now I cant? How is that okay again? How does that fit into your over simplified logic of what is happening here?
I really don't care either way, I have no intention of building apps for the iphone ever, but your point isn't insightful it is inaccurate.
demand cant be met... odd that I can go to bestbuy right now and purchase one.
1 million sold to brick and mortar/catalog stores does not equate to 1 million sold to consumers. Why no one calls them on this number is beyond me. Must be the magic they have in them.
So, writing an application for the iPhone is free now? I mean, it probably only took them an hour or so right? Seems like a pretty simple solution they have come up with couldn't have taken them more than two.
"Americans seem happy with what we have and there is no motivation to make things better despite the fact that there's plenty of room for improvement."
Ahhh, the fluoride in the water is totally working.
MATH AND ALCOHOL DON'T MIX! Please, don't drink and derive. Mathematicians Against Drunk Deriving