I tried to heal that boy over there and failed.... then this woman came and did it like it was nothing.
Either I am obsolete or she must me a witch...
Burn the witch!

People never had the humanity they always claimed.

The story you're referring to seems to be a creative piece generated by a language model like ChatGPT. It's important to understand that stories or content created by AI models are not produced with sentient understanding or personal experience. Instead, these models use patterns in the data they were trained on to generate text.

In the case of descriptions of coffee shops or any other specific settings, the AI uses its training on a wide variety of texts to create a plausible scenario. These descriptions are based on common themes, descriptions, and elements found in texts about coffee shops. However, since the AI doesn't have personal experiences or sentience, its creations are purely imitative and based on statistical likelihoods.

Regarding the concern about AI and job replacement, AI-generated content like stories is an example of how technology can be used to automate certain tasks. However, it's important to note that while AI can assist in or even take over some tasks, it does not possess the creativity, emotional depth, or genuine understanding that a human brings to creative writing or other professions. The discussion about AI in the workforce is ongoing and multifaceted, balancing the benefits of automation and efficiency with the importance of human skills and jobs.

I think its inevitable that one way or another we are going to end up with something like a dns registry for people where we each register our public keys and the internet will be divided into signed content and unsigned content. Really should have happened a long time ago. Without any kind of reputation attached to it, anonymous content is just about trolling for eyeballs and should be treated as such.

Interesting take... but still a little ambiguous. Lets say I tied a rope around you and tossed you over a cliff. If I then let go of the rope because you don't have the right to use my body should I be blameless? I understand the situations are not the same... but the fetus is in the situation it is in because of the choices of the parents.

Apart from that I agree with the hypocrisy of the pro-life movement.

Thank you for your response.

The generality I was trying to point out in 1 & 2 is that scientifically you can only regress (ask why, how, or where did that come from?) a finite number of times before you arrive at one of several conclusions:
a. I don't know, but choose to believe anyway (faith)
b. I don't know but some really smart guy somewhere that has studied this does (faith in percieved authority)
c. I don't know and therefore regard my understanding of the parent elements as non-absolute.

It seems that if any premise is slightly plausible and is accompanied by a sufficiently complex explanation then the recipient must either claim to understand, agree with and thereafter support the premise or appear to be ignorant and lacking in comprehension. I know this is true of many theologies, I am just pointing out that a "scientific" worldview is not in practice any different.

I think that science as a tool has provided a great deal of benefit in that it has given us accurate measures of observable phenomenon, and that by producing models of these phenomenon we are able to derive practical tools. But I also think that there is a tendency to want to apply this tool outside of the domain in which it is valid. To the extent that we believe all of reality is testable and that our understanding of it is absolute. Given our obvious limitations it seems evident that this is not the case, and yet the scientific atheist chooses to ridicule those that dare to look beyond the limited box he has confined himself to.

God does not "give" hope, basically hope is the result of looking for something greater than has so far been experienced. When one hopes for any kind of future it becomes obvious that if all we can ever be or accomplish will eventually be heat uniformly distributed across the universe at the apex of entropy then we must either accept that our motivation to go on is dependent on continuing to suspend disbelief through constant distraction and denial or be willing to look for evidence that is not limited to the finite and fully comprehensible. Basically because we hope we look for God, and if we don't limit our search to those things that are so small we can fully understand and explain them then we find an abundance of evidence.

I don't dispute that religion(s) of all forms have been used for evil ends. The same is true of non-religious institutions. The reason is that both are composed of a huge number of regular people with complex motivations, when the primary motivation is pride and the advancement of self evil will become evident. I think that your judgement is prejudiced by your preconceptions in this case, but I doubt you will be swayed by anecdotes or statistics. Power and pride lead to corruption, and religion can certainly be a means to power but I challenge you to attempt a more balanced understanding before you resort to wholesale condemnation.

Disclosure: I am a Christian who has daily questioned my belief but hold to the commitment I made 30+ years ago. Sometimes I feel good about it, other times I have doubts, but that makes no difference with respect to the commitment I know I made. When I think about atheism though I wonder about the following things. If anyone has good answers it would be helpful at least to me.

1. Where do we come from? As I understand it we evolved. And where did those things come from, as I understand it they spontaneously appeared from a "primordial soup", which existed as a result of "the big bang" which so far as I know there is no explanation for ... just that it must have happened.

2. What are we made of? That would apparently be molecules, which are made of atoms which are made of subatomic particles, of which we can only see evidence of a few given great effort and what we can see seems completely inexplicable. Matter is almost completely empty space, protons should repel each other in a nucleus but are somehow held to together by a "strong force" ... what is that? What is light? What causes gravity, or magnetism? How can we scientifically "know" something when it is built upon complete mystery?

3. What are we for? In most cases those who look for the greatest hope available and strive for it against all odds instead of just giving up are admired. Except in the case of faith they are ridiculed. It seems the atheists are those that when faced with a difficult challenge with small odds of success merely lie down and claim it is hopeless. There is no purpose, there is no future, everything is meaningless. Not only that, but they think that by discounting all except that for which they have direct proof and giving up to the perceived inevitable, that they somehow attain intellectual superiority.

It seems obvious to me that with the 3lbs or so of neurons and fat in our head, and our brief stint on this small earth and limited capacity to perceive, comprehend or remember it that we must either admit to a degree of faith or be logically delusional. Not finding sufficient proof, or having the capacity to comprehend the proof I have for a belief for or against God I instead choose to pursue the goal that offers the greatest hope. Evidence will not be found in carefully constructed arguments, but by looking for those things that make people into better people. Kinder, more generous, more loving, more forgiving, more hopeful. I am aware that many Christians have failed in this regard and I regret that, but I pay more attention to the many that have succeeded.

No comment on the first question. As far as a shower I just sprayed myself with a garden hose in the front yard for the first couple years. It was fairly miserable in the winter and involved a lot of hyperventilating and gritting teeth. Last year I found that walmart online had a propane inline water heater so now I have an outdoor shower that is quite pleasant.

Lucky for me I am pretty much free from assets :)

Yea... it is 19ft diameter with a trampoline suspended from the ceiling as a sleeping platform. So fairly small. I have some recent pictures of the outside, but the inside is not as presentable as I would like due to it being both a house and a tool shed. Half of it is tools which means it is pretty much constantly cluttered inside. Hopefully will add a tool shed this year and get all that stuff out. Can send you the outside pics if you want, but it was just another small snowstorm like the last ones. It is comfortable for a single guy without aspirations of being seen by, never mind keeping up with the Jonses. It would suck if there was more than one person living in here that.

I am outside city limits and did all the work myself. Basically you can do this sort of thing out in the country and get away with it. I don't think it would be possible inside a zoned area. At least not without a lot of money and effort.

With the rising temperatures in Arkansas I think we may be Arizona in a few years anyway. Property in Canada may soon be fairly temperate.

I know... I am saving a little... but I doubt any amount would be "enough" at the rate things seem to be going. I have basic medical insurance but when the time comes I am sure I will be screwed like everybody else. Probably good that I don't have a family. My main concern is the quality of fertilizer I will make wherever I end up.

Thanks... will let you know when my contract runs out in about 4 months. I need to find someone with sprint to see if it will work at my house first.

FYI... I thought I would post the webstats from the above comment. Usually my pitiful little blog gets about 30 hits a day. In 30 min I have 557 (359 unique). From just this comment thread... crazy.

Thanks for the tip... sprint partially covers this area so it may work.