How many tug boats would it take to drag that to the coast of California?

There is a bigger security impact here. If say John, who works for the CIA, files a patent for cool new thing-a-majig that will revolutionize the US's ability to spy on say spy satellite communications. That fact that John works for the CIA and he filed this patent, the foriegn governments will be able to put 2 and 2 together and know that there is a possibility that their satellite communications security has been compromised. Who is running these ideas for this new incentivization through risk analysis/security review?

Porn!

Not at my ISP. Damn, that's fast.

East Bay 925 numbers and N. California 530 numbers are not able to receive voicemail.

Speaking as a folically challenged man, yeah!

To answer the question, yes, the passion was different then and not just in the developers, but with the users/clients. The users/clients were excited about the new techologies promises and look to the developers to lead them to the promised land. The developers were there because they wanted to be, not just because of the promises of riches or there high school counselor said CS would be a good job. Many of the people I worked with in the 80s and 90s were self taught even before getting into college. The passion was organic and the exicitment of the new computer paradym feed that passion.

Nothing but political theater to dot the I's and cross the T's for democrats to say this tried to do something.

These workers that have been identified as possibly exposed should have a "Whole body scan" that will be the gold standard. My prayers go out to them and their families.

Ooops!

Please understand that money is the reason that companies make this devices. When security concerns raise their ugly head, they get slapped down. Ego, we have devices that are open for exploitation. Security will also be ignored when $$$ are you objective. If customers stop buying these devices because they are insecure then, and only then will manufactures add the cost of security into the price of these devices.

An the pour worker gets $40/hour. This is a story I see more and more often. An authorize contracting company will supply us a candidate. We hire the candidate at the agreed upon rate of $100/hour. We find out later after he is on board that he has a second contracting company who is his prime contracting agency. This prime agency is not an authorize company to deal with my company. The resulting pay per hour after the authorized contracting company takes their 30-40% and the prime contracting company takes their 30-40% is that pour worker gets $40-$50 per hour. It gets worse, after the period of time that the worker has performed well and we wanted to hire them and transfer the H1-B to my company, the prime contracting company says that if he does this they will report to the government that he didn't actually work in the US. We found out later that they were paying them in Rupee in India. Loopholes are for the dishonest and greedy.

Of course they did. Profit, not the quality and in this case the quantity of service, is the motive here. But, that was obvious.

Who is this Utah Bill?