Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:YES!! (Score 0) 174

I applaud the direction internet archive takes. They should fully implement it.

A year ago one of my domain names was stolen, through negligence of the registrar. The site was a non-profit resource that I maintained for the past 15 years. The squatter who now owns the name put deny all in robots.txt. As the result the website with some quantity of useful information has totally disappeared from existence and from the archive record.

I do not see sufficiently important reasons to remove information that was once in public access. There are some reasons, however the public benefits of having access to all past public information outweigh all them.

Utter nonsense. If your "website with some quantity of useful information" was in any way important you would have republished the content on a new domain, which would have been indexed by search engines quite quickly. Archive.org is not a substitute for your obvious lack of due care in taking backups of your data.

Archive.org is NOT an official archive of the web. If they stop respecting robots.txt, then why should others keep respecting it? They claim to be special but they are not any different from any other search engine or data harvester.

Comment Hipster bull (Score 2) 69

It has nothing to do with privacy issues, nothing to do with practicality. The "small and distinctive minority" is nothing but a bunch of sad hipsters for whom everything which is worse is actually "better". Their cultural references are limited, their outlook is stunted, they think that the 1950s and 1960s were the epitome of civilization. They are "flat white" as much as their coffee: no depth to their lives, and as white as a country music gig. Typewriters are toys for privileged adulescents.

Slashdot Top Deals

MAC user's dynamic debugging list evaluator? Never heard of that.

Working...