All your comments on if he should return and how to get a fair trial I must assume is hyperbole.
The very law he's charged under prevents him from putting up ANY defense at all. All he can basically do nothing more than plead guilty, or not guilty. There is no jury of his peers. She is so smug and confidant in the public's idiocy that she say's this publicly. To many who I would think have enough knowledge of the issue to know that she is lying out right.
Of course the general public doesn't know this. They think he could get a fair trial. That's the law right? That's how it works? No, that's not how it works. She says, "Challenge it, speak out, engage in a constructive act of protest". How would he or we be able to do that when we don't know there is a problem or what that problem is? It's laughable.
Finally. since we found out about it, we've been doing nothing but challenging it, speaking out, and engaging in a constructive protest. What has that gotten us? NOTHING. Using the tool provided never gets us anything because they're simply ignored. Does she want James R. Clapper to face the consequences of his actions. Dick Cheney, George W Bush? FUCK OFF.