A big no. I visited Austin many times. The only unique thing there is their bats. Then I hear that the Texas freeze killed many of them. Not sure if going to the Congress Avenue Bridge will be the same.
In the late 90s, the up and coming tech hubs were advertised to be Silicon Valley, Seattle, Boston, Raleigh Triangle and Austin. My friends and I had reasons to like and love each one of these locations. But the most dislike was for Austin. Here are our reasons:
1. No seasons. Austin (and Texas in general) is barren landscape-wise compared to the other locations.
2. Too far from everything. Dallas is over 3 hours away, and that's the only real city anywhere near Austin (San Antonio, yeah right).
3. Nothing unique there. Except bats. Every other city on the list has very unique things to do. Silicon Valley? San Francisco, Wine country, Redwood trees, LOTS of companies, Boston? Near NY and tons of historic things to do, Seattle? Canada, mountains, ocean. Raleigh/Durham Triangle? Tall trees, best weather, lots of hiking, mountains, ocean
4. Sports? None. Raleigh had no professional sports back then (now it has NFL in Charlotte and NHL), but also a HUGE college atmosphere with Duke, UNC, NC State and Wake Forest.
5. Texas culture. Too much boasting how great they are.
As a software developer, I lived in both Silicon Valley and Raleigh. I knew friends who went everywhere except for Austin. I knew many people who were born in Houston or Dallas. Nobody liked Austin. I visited Austin many times on business trips. Nope. Still not a place I'd like to be.
It might work for some people, but not most people.