In the IEEE article, it was stated that the cathode problem has not yet been solved. Can you elaborate on this? Were the lab experiments conducted without a cathode?

Flamebait? I was thinking funny, but maybe my sense of the ha ha's is different.

And a fourth that it was Al Gore who reinvented the universe.

I wouldn't draw any conclusion from it except that there wasn't any significant trend in OHC over that five year period as per the Argo network. One caveat would be that there could be instrumentation/analytical errors. Another is that OHC could be increasing with a superimposed cyclical pattern and that this period measured the peak to trough of that cycle.

We'll have a clearer picture in another 20-30 years.

Except Ocean Heat Content, as measured by the Argo network, did not show any significant trend for the period 2004-2008.

http://pielkeclimatesci.wordpress.com/2010/09/08/comment-on-the-skeptical-scientist-weblog-regarding-their-post-pielke-sr-and-scientific-equivocation-dont-beat-around-the-bush-roger/

Hi. I have a very stupid question for someone working in the field of entanglement.

Spin is measured as up or down, but presumably the spin is actually at some angle in between. So the up or down measurement is rounding the actually spin. Is the resulting rounding error of any significance? Is the accumulation of rounding errors on multiple measurements of any significance? Or, as is most likely, is this a nonsensical question?

Thanks