Comment Re:The obvious question: (Score 2) 76
Comment Re:MCP? That's not re-assuring (Score 1) 30
Comment Re:They should call it... (Score 2) 23
Comment Larry Niven was prescient (Score 2) 60
Comment Re:Touch a Nerve or Something? (Score 1) 663
Comment Re:What a diverse team means to me (Score 2) 333
Comment Congratulations to every one involved (Score 4) 64
Comment Re:lol (Score 1) 166
Comment Re:So fix it for $diety sake (Score 1) 130
Comment Re:After the cloth didn't wipe it... (Score 1) 612
Comment Re:these algorithms may be immensely complicated (Score 1) 211
Comment Whitney Houston (Score 1) 244
Comment Re:What is intuitive (Score 1) 404
It's sensible to keep your tank low - vehicles are more efficient if they aren't hauling extra fuel weight. Aircraft operators have this down to a fine art.
I've heard its better to keep the tank near full in order to minimise the surface area inside the tank for condensation to form, this helping to prevent water from pooling at the bottom of the tank.
Comment Re:Uhhh...meaning? (Score 1) 232
He's building synergy. It's a paradigm shift.
The law of conservation of synergy: synergy cannot be created or destroyed, only transferred to a different paradigm.
"The law of conservation of synergy: synergy cannot be created or destroyed, only shifted to a different paradigm." FTFY