While there are people escaping war and famine, the majority of people trying to get into Europe are young males looking for work. They're economic migrants, not refugees or seeking asylum. The allure of higher wages spurs them on but quite frankly they'd be better off staying put than risk being indebted to criminal gangs or dying attempting to cross. Even if they succeed Europe is taking a far harder line and will periodically sweep them up and deport them.

And Ceuta is a waste of time. Climbing the razor wire or arriving by boat does not grant immigration status or let somebody board a ferry to mainland Spain. The place is tiny 19sq km, and police / military will immediately escort people back out to Morocco even in normal circumstances, i.e. it's pointless to even try. The flash mob found this out too, the ones who didn't drown that is, getting escorted straight back out again.

Apple has longer support but software is only part of the story. Apple started the trend of planned obsolescence in phones by sealing in the batteries and making them hard to service & repair. It would be a lucky phone that managed to survive 5+ years without being consigned to the trash or a drawer because it's not economical to have it repaired.

It will be interesting to see what Apple do when the EU starts forcing user-replaceable batteries and repairability in phones. Maybe they'll be dicks by dropping the software support to their devices to make them obsolete that way.

I've never seen a phone launch be so anticlimatic as the Pixel 11. Virtually all of the reviewers were meh about the price hike, the underwhelming new "features", the lack of RAM and the sense that Google have crapped out a very mediocre device. Google are part of the reason RAM is so scarce right so I guess it serves them right.

Exactly. It's an open invitation by the wearer to have violence done to them. People don't like cameras pointed in their faces without consent. Some countries might legally allow a person to be filmed but they're still going to be provoked. Other countries have an expectation of privacy built into law where consent is absolutely necessary to film them except in an incidental or narrowly defined basis.

It probably isn't a great way at all since you only have an approximate sense of what you're filming and have to crank your head in the direction you want to record which may not be practical with glasses perched on your face. Anyone interested in doing this would be better off just using a Gopro or a phone and holding it or putting it on a stand.

I see what he's saying and it's obvious. Cameras working off visible light have similar limitations as humans - conditions like snow, fog, rain, sun, shade, dark, reflections etc. all impact on what the car can see and compromises its safety. So why not use invisible light - infrared, or other radio waves like radar to penetrate further and identify hazards sooner?

This is obvious stuff and its demonstrable. Mark Rober did a series of tests on YouTube proving this exact point pitting a Tesla against a Lidar equipped car in various conditions and observing if they would crash into a wall of boxes. The Tesla failed miserably. The Tesla also disengaged autopilot a split second before collision which people speculate is so the company can pretend the driver was in control and caused the crash.

The only reason this debate is even happening is because Tesla likes to cut corners and pretend it is innovation - "oh we don't need radar any more because we have cameras!". It's a convenient excuse other automakers will use too if given a chance. It would require somebody like the EU to mandate autonomous vehicle safety must be by all reasonable means, and all makers expose granular safety data for this BS to be exposed.

All these companies are going the same way. Quite honestly I don't know why they bother selling a console at all. Just create an app and a controller that connects to the app. If someone has the bandwidth for digital downloads only then just stream the games.

Yes you're right, assuming social media only recommended what you followed. But obviously that is not what they do. Because views & engagement require exposing people to new content even if it is AI dogshit. So if they are going to do that, then they should provide buttons to say as much.

You're kidding I hope. LinkedIn is just a really shitty social media network and has its equivalent of blueticks where assholes and grifters can pay money to elevate their stupid opinions to the top of feeds. If there is any political slant to this crap it is to the right, but it does not follow that slop should be allowed to make things even worse.

Aggregate means a site can work out the number of views to people pushing the button and take a good guess. Especially if other content from the same channel also gets flagged. And it can be weighted against site reputation, engagement and other metrics. Being able to report slop is way overdue.

As I said "aggregate" and it can be reviewed. In addition, why is this any different than when social media offers thumbs down, or "do not recommend" or other mechanisms?

LinkedIn provides both. Anyhoo, every platform should have a button which is able to report slop, scam ads, copyright infringment and other things without the bullshit of filling out a lengthy form that will be denied. At least then there is an aggregate opinion that can be used to flag garbage content.

And if the supplier gave it on the hard drive to Netflix, then really they should have encrypted it and given a key to use the drive by some other channel like email

Netflix should at least encrypt the content so if somebody lifts the drives it's no good outside of the machine it came from. e.g. encrypted partition / files with a key protected with TPM.

There is no way any aircraft of that vintage would manage the trip without multiple stops. It would take 4-5 days to make the journey at best of times even before considering swathes of airspace controlled by the enemy.