Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:And then the next one (Score -1) 56

> That's assuming that Starship pans out, and that it matches SpaceX's proposed timeline (which they very rarely do),

Starship is undeniable gearing up for a launch in Q12022. Other rockets are nowhere near that.

> and that Starship is by that point reliable enough that people will be willing to send very expensive telescopes up on it. That's not a given

Webb is expensive because it has to fit in the rocket available. Starship can easily launch bigger but cheaper telescopes. And room in the budget for a backup / second scope.

Comment Re:$10 billion (Score 1) 56

Webb was hard because it had to fit on the current launch vehicles. Starship is scheduled to launch in Q12022 and it can easily carry a much larger - so simpler, cheaper and better - telescope. So let's start a competition to build one, with any overruns paid for by the winner. And make sure it's named after some obscure female astronomer, so the manhating politicos fund it.

Comment Re:And then the next one (Score 1) 56

"However, in the next few years, we're going to have some much bigger fairing rockets. Falcon Heavy..." Falcon Heavy ?! Erm, Starship. 9m wide, payload of 100tons plus. Test flight in Q12022. By the time a telescope is ready, Spacex will not be flying ANY Falcons any more, let alone configuring a Falcon Heavy for you.

Slashdot Top Deals

Quantum Mechanics is a lovely introduction to Hilbert Spaces! -- Overheard at last year's Archimedeans' Garden Party

Working...