Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
DEAL: For $25 - Add A Second Phone Number To Your Smartphone for life! Use promo code SLASHDOT25. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 Internet speed test! ×

Comment Re: Any sufficiently advanced technology... (Score 1) 166

We used Oraquick as part of a study of high-risk individuals, and would confirm positive results. It's also a fairly economic way to do quarterly screenings for people who are in high risk categories. Of course, an individual with the means, would opt for a full screening if they were worried about exposure from a particular event.

It's used in developed nations primarily in the same way it's used in developing nations - for people who do not necessarily have the resources for and access to medical care. Inexpensive and better than nothing.

Comment Re:Any sufficiently advanced technology... (Score 1) 166

In general, people in Africa probably have a lot more understanding of HIV/AIDS and the testing procedures than people in the West do. For example:

You say that HIV testing requires drawing blood and testing at a lab. Nope - HIV testing can now be done with saliva, in a cheap ($40) device, and give you results in about 15 minutes. A person in a country with a high rate of infection would very likely be at least somewhat familiar with such a thing considering that those tests are vastly cheaper than the old blood tests. Moreover, as far back as 2015, there was a smartphone dongle that came out that can test for HIV.

Given that we have gone from tests that required a doctor visit, could take days for results, and required blood to tests that can be done anywhere, require a little spit, and 15 minutes to get results, it absolutely wouldn't surprise me that someone would think that advances made it so that perhaps sweat from a fingertip could be analyzed to give a diagnosis. Given that we have gone from gigantic, hideously expensive satellite phones that didn't do anything but allow you to (barely) make and receive calls, to tiny, dirt cheap, and ridiculously capable smart phones, it absolutely wouldn't surprise me that someone might think that a phone could now be capable of performing that analysis.

And finally, she probably knows many, many, many people who have HIV or have died from AIDS. In many countries in Africa, HIV/AIDS is a common, everyday thing that many people deal with, either as having it or having people close to them who have it. To say someone is stupid because they allow a prank app that's just shy of feasible and that preys on an omnipresent threat - that's not just ignorant, but cruel.

Comment Whole lotta wrong in that. (Score 1) 313

The golden path should be:
1) User reports a problem to the service desk.
2) Service desk looks into the problem and either addresses it if it's user error or punts it to QA/testing.
3) QA/testing investigates and documents as much as possible about the bug - replication steps, affected screens, whatever. They would do this both in production and a staging environment to see if it's an environmental issue.
4) Developer takes the bug and figures out the issue, creates a fix, which is then sent back to QA/testing.
5) QA/testing tests the fix in a staging environment and signs off on it.
6) Fix gets deployed to pre-prod staging, QA tests it.
7) Fix gets deployed to production, QA tests it.

I get that in smaller shops devs tend to just push stuff out (I worked in a few of those) but that's really not a great way to do things.

Comment Re:The best one... (Score 1) 141

Have you considered that maybe your brain and eyes are damaged or inferior? I put it in that way because you seem to have anger at people who don't get motion sickness from VR and went out of your way to preemptively belittle and insult.

I've had a dozen or so people over to play with my Rift ad Sony VR systems, and only one person indicated discomfort, and that was at the teleport mechanic in a couple of games.

Mostly I find games are substantially more immersive, and the only issue I have is when I run into a real-life obstacle that isn't visible in VR. I have scraped knuckles from smacking into a (very real) wall when trying to pick something up in VR.

Comment Re:Luck not a factor? (Score 2) 191

Which human's math skills? Humans have a staggering range of capabilities. Average? Then average in which way? A savant? Then a savant in which way?

And what about autistics who happen to be very good at poker but lousy at reading human expressions?

There are multiple different ways to be good at poker, and this system is just using one of them, and is clearly quite good at this particular way.

I also didn't see anyone making the claim that this was a hard or general purpose AI. It's not, and you acting like someone did make that claim is kind of weird. It's a system that is beating some of the best players at a game that was previously deemed to be very challenging to do computationally.

Comment Re:Not sure what to think.... (Score 1) 798

I'm curious about this - do you grab people's junk before using a gendered pronoun with them, or just ask? It seems really awkward.

Follow-up question - if you're not having sex with them, why do you care about what they have between their legs? It seems a bit weird to me to put that much emphasis on someone else's genitals, but hey, whatever floats your boat!

Comment Re:Violence or discrimination? (Score 2) 434

Stating specifically what they are concerned with in this particular case doesn't state that they aren't also concerned with other behaviors if they see them. They mentioned the specific behaviors they found problematic in this case.

However, by all means, if you see advertisers on this network engaging in hate speech against majority groups, you should bring it to their attention.

Comment Trump and his supporters should DEMAND a recount. (Score 1) 1321

They're certain he won fair and square and keep on saying there's a mandate for him, right?

If they're smart, they'll insist on a recount so that they can remove any doubt about the legitimacy of this election.

If they're actually interested in democracy, they'll want to make sure that everything is above board.

I actually don't know why we don't automatically recount after an election, period, if only to make sure we got something this important correct.

Comment Re:Understandable, but foolish (Score 1) 386

You don't have to wonder - just look at migration to the US in the 18th and 19th centuries.

My grandfather came here from a farm in Mongolia in 1906, alone, at the age of 12, and found himself in New York City. That might as well have been going 500 years into the future, just he did it by boat rather than time machine. Given the difficulties at the time as well, there was no going back.

People did it all the time back then, and still kind of do today, though arguably globalization has made it substantially less jarring. Some fail, some merely survive, and some manage to thrive.

Comment Re:So you slag Trump by objectifying his wife? (Score 1) 143

There's a bit of difference between using pictures a person had taken voluntarily for sexual gratification and actually objectifying the person themselves.

Or, in another way of putting it, just because someone posed for explicit pictures does not mean that's the sum total of their value as a person, which is what "sexual objectification" is usually taken to mean - they aren't a person, but an object that has no value other than to be used for sexual gratification.

Given what I've read from you in the past, I'm pretty sure you'd agree she's still a human being, even if she is married to a walking bottle of spray tan with a shitty hairpiece.

Comment Re:You keep saying that word... (Score 1) 954

Only a moron thinks the world I'm talking is hypothetical - it's the world we live in today.

Look at food production. It used to consume huge amounts of human labor, proportional to the population, and yet now it takes vastly less, in part due to tooling and automation. Do you seriously think that trend won't continue?

Look at construction. It's a hugely labor intensive industry... Except where robots are working on putting together (and in some cases making) pre-fab components. Do you seriously think that this trend won't also continue?

Look at the cost of obtaining raw materials and how it has vastly decreased over time. Do you think that trend won't also continue? Imagine herds of bots and bacterium going through landfills and converting yesterday's trash into today's materials. Oh wait, you don't have to - this is already being done, on a very small scale, in labs today.

It's actually more expensive - and dehumanizing and demeaning - to provide social services today in the way that we do rather than it would be to just give those who can't afford it a basic (and by no means luxurious) standard of living.

The majority of people ALREADY don't do a damn thing to ensure that we have the basic essentials of life, and the vast majority of people ALREADY do work that can (and most certainly will) be easily and more effectively done by machines.

It's amusing - and a little sad - that you seem to lack the ability to think of humans at leisure as anything other than "loafing around." Why should only a select few be allowed to focus on pursuits that interest them rather than just survival?

What makes them so special that they should be spared from toil? Look at someone who slaves away in a sweat shop 16 hours a day for scraps and tell me - with a straight face - that they aren't working as hard as some IBanker who just shuffles money around and creates nothing. Yet one of them would die in a month if they lost their job, and the other will make enough money by 40 to live like a god until the end of their days.

It's people like you who are exactly what I'm referring to when I talk about people with their heads in their asses.

The sooner we all come to realize that the very fundamentals of human survival have changed, the sooner we can embrace what's already happened and the less disruptive it will be.

Our economy is ALREADY in the shitter, by the way: we have children who go hungry, despite the fact that we make enough food to feed the entire planet several times over. We have mothers and daughters and sisters and fathers and sons and brothers who die to easily preventable diseases and easily treatable illnesses just because they can't afford to pay for it, despite the fact that the necessary vaccines and treatments are actually very inexpensive. We have young minds going into crippling debt to obtain a college education because they HAVE to in order to get a low paying job that will never make use of that education or risk starving amidst plenty.

If you don't think THAT is a description of an economy in the shitter, then I pity you.

Comment Re:You keep saying that word... (Score 0) 954

What happens is that we finally pull our collective heads out of our collective asses and realize that maybe there should be more to "being human" than slaving away for 40+ hours a week doing busywork just to scrape by.

We give everyone a minimum level of housing, food, clothing and access to services, and quit worrying about what they do to earn it. Maybe most will just fuck off and watch endless Law & Order reruns, but who cares? It isn't like they're taking anything away from anyone else. But we might also see an explosion in people turning towards more creative pursuits because now they aren't so bone weary from putting up with some bullshit McJob and can actually focus on something with a bit more meaning than flipping burgers or cleaning grills.

We could do this *now* except we're too fucking up our own asses with the whole protestant work ethic thing that we're acting against our own best interest.

Comment Re:American people should have a voice (Score 1) 629

How is this insightful?

The American people had a voice: They re-elected President Obama in 2012. Either he's President or he isn't, and either it's the President's job to submit nominees, or it isn't. The only temporal limits are the date's the President is in office, period, full stop.

The American people had a voice: They elected every member of the Senate. Either they're the Senate or their not, and either it's their job to consider and confirm/deny nominees, or it isn't. I don't care if they vote down any nominee outright, but refusing to do their jobs is bullshit.

If the American people want more direct say in such matters, then they should vote for officials who will vote for constitutional amendments that will make this a direct democracy. It's the dumbest fucking idea I can imagine (in this context), but that's how they have a voice.

Don't like it? Then either work to change it or fuck right off.

Slashdot Top Deals

"If it's not loud, it doesn't work!" -- Blank Reg, from "Max Headroom"

Working...