If you read the article carefully, they are talking about lenses THINNER than a hair. I see several of the posts here thinking the width/radius of the lenses is this small, a reasonable mistake given the way this was written. Having a radius that small would severely reduce their light gathering ability, requiring very bright light or very dim images or very long exposure times.

-

Due to a disability, I can only type with my right hand. It definitely slows my typing. But, I have learned to work around this. For example, I use "sticky keys" which lets me type Shift, Ctrl, Alt, and release those keys. so, Ctrl+C is typed by pressing Ctrl then releasing it, then pressing C then releasing it. The regular way also works while "sticky keys" is enabled.

I think the point of the "study" is that those who get UBI continue employed work, refuting a common claim that much of the population would quit working.

Does it really matter?

To the extent people do quit working, there is more work to do, allowing those who want more luxuries to get another job and earn extra money for that.

I have doubts about this study. I believe it does not study the reality of an economy with a UBI (emphasis on "universal" ... everyone gets it). things could be very different in such an economy. maybe they then need to study how it effects 122 people not getting a UBI.

i would call it a misstudy. how would a UBI affect behavior in an economy that is not getting virtually any UBI. a true study would provide a UBI to the entire income earning aged population to correctly see how the study group behaves in a UBI affected economy.

Did Biden have the mental capacity to understand wealth?

he said "trump".

Like the Japanese do?

As long as Apple sticks to this. I am sure they will find the revenue stream to allow "logos" that are animations with sounds that soon get loud, and trigger vibrators, too. what revenue stream enhancing innovation comes next?

Is this based on the caller ID number that comes with the call? Caller ID can be forged. Or is Apple sending some other out-of-band info, or delivering the call via internet (using up your carrier's allocation to your account)? First, we need a law (not just an FCC regulation) that requires carriers to verify that caller ID coming in from every customer is a number that would be routed out that trunk (e.g one of their numbers), and let that operate a while (a year or two) so we have correct caller ID (with severe penalties for carriers that fail) for a while.

They will be gathering finer precision and higher definition.

And, eventually, we'll depend on this.

How long until these things are cracked by someone? then we might see some prices jumping around.

Are you trying to create a spike in the market demand for VPNs?

in which country's laws?

How much of this content will be in 4K? I don't want 8K. I looked at an 8K display, once, and I had to be way up too close to get any more detail than 4K given my aging eyes. And will it take video out from my computer's 4K card and put it on the big screen without other wiring?

And what up/down bandwidth will I get concurrently with this?