Comment Re:A shining example of what the article talked ab (Score 1) 803
I'm trying to inform you of the common arguments in this debate. There are many good arguments on both sides. That slashdot story had many good comments on both sides. NOT 'EVIDENCE ON MY SIDE.' The wikipedia page has good info, perhaps laid out better for you to read:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_politics_in_the_U S
It is good to debate things, but to be a jerk about it (ie. MY WAY OR THE HIGHWAY!) is not good for debate, nor does it make you look like an intelligent person. (Even though that is Bush's motto.)
Put up, or be exposed as either a dupe or bald-faced liar.
Nor do comments like that.
If you have any dignity for yourself left, please stop.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_politics_in_the_
It is good to debate things, but to be a jerk about it (ie. MY WAY OR THE HIGHWAY!) is not good for debate, nor does it make you look like an intelligent person. (Even though that is Bush's motto.)
Put up, or be exposed as either a dupe or bald-faced liar.
Nor do comments like that.
If you have any dignity for yourself left, please stop.
