I am wondering, if an AI would do a better job than Nadella. People often talk about replacing engineers, however, AI would likely be much better suited to replace CxO jobs.

I can do that with my 1989 HP48SX . For arbitrary precision I have to use an additional library though.

Thanks for your answer, its an answer I heard too often to complain about you.

Just note, that it is exactly this adiabatic lapse that confused me 30 years ago, and after investigating, I found no reasonable explanation in current science. In fact I found relevant issues in Boltzmanns "Vorlesungen über Gastheorie", and I found people who experimentally showed that this law is not universable applicable. I am aware of the term "alternative truth", but in that case, I would just say that it is the second law, that science handles like a religion of galileos times.

Thats what I am questioning. In fact I have written a short article because to explain the situation that can be found at https://azouhr.github.io/2ndla... .

Basically, whenever a particle is flying down (randomly) it increases speed and becomes warmer, and when rising, the speed is reduced and it becomes colder. This is exactly what you see in Atmospheres, where external radiation is not too high to change the behavior.

I would be more than happy if you were able to show me the error in that thoughts, however I also learned in the meantime, that Joseph Loschmid found the behavior in 1875 (yes, that is 19th century) and was at least partially confirmed by Maxwell. Since 150 years, science has not been able to find an error in what Loschmid postulated. Therefore even thought I came to the same conclusion, I am by far not the first person to find this.

Actually this thermodynamic concept is just an assumption that cannot be challenged by scientists without loosing all their reputation. It is not accurate however, because if you manage to macroscopic sort the particles into high and low entropy particles, you can gain exergetic energy from a single energy pool.

This sorting is automatically true for example for any atmosphere (read gas in a gravitational field), and thus the whole idea of heat death is based on wrong assumptions.

I would be happy if those were just morons. I actually do have the impression all of that shadow communication is really needed for a deep state and for mafia style operations that should not be documented in official records. Still hope that I am wrong.

For me, it really is a usability challenge when I have to use Windows at work. Although, I would not call it challenge but nightmare.

It should be kind of easy to create even an early warning system as well as evidence on who did what by just listening to acoustics in the sea. I suppose, that those ships will let down their anchor not so long before the cable -- which creates some noise. But then, they will not stop their engine, and instead thrust forward in order to create the damage. Means, when a ship lowers the anchor but does not stop the engine, you could already send your troops...

No war can be won with nukes. Nukes are a lose-lose weapon.

Just because Deppenapostroph was simply translated as idiot's apostrophe: In German, you have both, Depp, and Idiot. However Depp is kind of a vile version of Idiot. So, you are not just an idiot, but a stupid one. The meaning is not just by chance used on this topic.

So, regardless what some "authorities" say, this apostrophe will always tell something about yourself if you use it.

You are probably unaware, that openSUSE Leap 15.5 is binary identical to SLES15 SP5. SUSE makes it really easy to evaluate SLES by giving the customers openSUSE Leap, and allowing them to switch to the supported variant later on, even without reinstall.

The only thing you should be aware off is, that not all packages in openSUSE Leap are available or supported from SLES.

The RHEL EULA is not compliant with the OSI Open Source definition. Thus all software that has the RHEL EULA applied to it, is not Open Source anymore.

However, they do not allow their customers to redistribute the source code.

It is not RedHat that has issues with that procedure. It is also not RHEL Clones that have issues. They can rightly and easily build and redistribute everything like before. The only one that is really hurt, is the customer that signs the RHEL EULA. Those customers are limited with the usage of the code to cases, where they are not required to provide the sources. This has consequences:

• They cannot create RHEL based containers (or Flatpak and the like) and distribute them to third party
• They cannot provide Services from software that contains AGPL licenses
• They cannot rely on the OSI definition of Open Source to check if they are compliant

Especially not being able to rely on the OSI definition is troublesome. This actually means, that they have to check each and every package used against the usecase that it is intended for. With RHEL, you cannot decide between "free" and "nonfree" anymore, because the EULA changes every package to nonfree. If RHEL just keep on going, they might already be not compliant with the OSS license they thought to have from the package. This in turn would mean, that they have a subscription, but no license anymore.

Why would you call something "freedom units" when it actually was forced on people by the British Empire? That Imperial System should long have been extinguished, given the fact that it is inconsistent when crossing different scientific disciplines, which was the very reason for SI in the first place.