Comment Re:Makes one wonder... (Score 1) 148
No... no, they'd pretty do that immediately.
Did you accidentally an adverb?
Comment Re:Safety Critical (Score 1) 913
Actually, it can be pretty useful for slowing down without your brake lights coming on, such as when a cop is trailing you.
I admit I've used them for just this purpose.
Comment Re:Spoiler: Why it's dying; emits one last factoid (Score 1) 181
I wonder what the creationist community would be shitting in that case
Bibles.
Comment Re:The comment may also be complex.. (Score 1) 660
Comment Re:Floating? (Score 1) 252
Comment Re:What's next? (Score 1) 645
I was going to say "bollocks to that", but I'd probably have to pay royalties to the Sex Pistols.
Never mind the Sex Pistols - Here's the BOLLOCKS!
Comment Re:seriously? (Score 1) 550
Comment Re:1.4 billion? What is that describing? (Score 1) 200
Hmm, lots of hang time, continuous 24/7 monitoring, sounds more likely to be used over zones of occupation and perhaps even domestically, rather than any actual battlefields. For that investment dollar it certainly sounds like they will be loading them up with much more than just radar systems and will be looking to incorporate every kind of monitoring equipment available as well as the latest in telecommunications interception and tracking systems.
Israel uses aerostats similar to these to hold aloft monitoring and jamming equipment for long periods, and I assure you that if you have a fleet of jets and ground based anti-aircraft batteries, you can guard them well enough
Comment The solution? PURE ELECTRIC. (Score 1) 307
Comment Sounds like "Becalmed in Hell" (Score 1) 156
Comment Re:Maybe (Score 1) 187
Comment Re:Another good reason. (Score 1) 361
Comment Re:Did I miss the news? (Score 1) 399
Guess I'll have to settle for Insightful.
Comment Re:I need a new computer, this one is full... (Score 1) 1654
Not sure if that's intentional commentary on the show, or an ironic spelling mistake.
It's BOTH, you insensitive clod!