You've already been linked examples of warnings that uranium is pyrophoric (do you even know what that means?) and will react even with cold water. No catalysts needed or high temperatures needed.

Should ask that your self, since you've been shown to be wrong about a lot of things, by several people, with links, yet you keep finding ways to be so fundamentally wrong, you either can't read, or are a troll.

Powerharvester stuff is designed for use with a base station that transmits 1-3 W of power, and has a maximum range listed as 40-50 ft for such a base station. That is not designed for use with ambient RF.

There are other systems for collecting ambient RF, but their power is considerably less without a large antenna. Even Powerharvester supplies ~6" antennas for use with their dev kits.

That requires gating the camera on the nanosecond time scale, which is many orders of magnitude away from something like this and a whole different technology. Most work with such cameras are limited to actually very slow frame rates (e.g. 60 Hz) but with a very fast shutter. The speed of such cameras is improving, and there is some tech coming out that allows multiple frames at nanosecond to picosecond separation, but it would still be a burst situation where you take a couple dozen images then have to wait milliseconds or longer to do it again. Neat videos of light propagation using such methods typically involve taking thousands of identical sequences and stitching them back together.

At a distance of 1 light year, it would be about 40 arcseconds across, so about the size of Jupiter as seen from Earth.

Argon compounds have been formed in the lab for nearly 15 years. No Nobel compounds have been directly observed in space of any kind, which is the new part, not that Argon in particular was found in a compound.

You complain of people being delusional and yet make such a stupid mistake as this. Which executive order and which action within controls guns? He's issued orders telling people to review polices and internals rules, to discuss and analyze the implications of various things and to share information or promote something. None of that is overriding Congress's laws or creating laws or new gun control without Congress. To be so disconnected from reality, you expect others to listen to what you say and trust your judgement of others' grip on reality?

What universities and fields offer tenure positions for just instructing 3 to 4 classes a semester? At the places I've worked, you would get maybe $2-3k per course you instructed, with no guarantee you would be rehired the next semester. As more tenure track professors retired, the number of people being paid as instructors like this has grown to the point of being the majority of how course instructors are paid at some places. To get tenure, you had to climb the ladder several years of successfully pulling in grant money and getting recognized for research, while hoping that there would still be a possible tenure position when you get that instead of some budget freeze preventing it, or the department deciding they want use the few tenure options on a different subfield, so as to not even give you a chance.

The word "impartial" in the first sentence should, hopefully obviously, be the word "partial." Inflammable and flammable might mean the same thing thanks to Latin, but impartial and partial should be kept straight...

This works in any simple base using the same concept of decimal representation.

In base x, consider the number zero followed by n digits of (x-1) after the decimal point, e.g. 0.FF...F with n Fs for hexadecimal. One minus this number gives the difference 1/x^n. In the limit n goes to infinity, this difference goes to zero for real numbers. And with the real numbers, zero difference means they are the same number.

This is only true if you define limit "math" to mean arithmetic and what simple calculators do. Algebra gives the abstract tools to work with numbers without needing the decimal expansion. By trigonometry and especially calculus, pi gets used a lot in an exact sense. Although sometimes the fundamental basis of what it means to work with an real numbers doesn't get covered until a course on real analysis.

Mathematical proofs are a way of finding new properties of a system by making deductions from previously known properties, and in a practical sense are often a short-cut finding, the new property without testing every possible case.

For a simple example, consider the property that every integer multiplied by by 10 will end up with a zero in the ones place. Someone could respond: "How could you know that? There are an infinite number of integers and it would take infinite amount of time to multiply each by 10 to check it." But using a proof can rigorously show this is a pattern without testing every number by exploiting the properties of numbers.

In the case of multiplying 0.999... you can workout what the pattern any given digit will follow, and use that instead of manually performing the calculation.