Re:Science and religions/atheism should not mix (Score 1)

Well, you're just using different definitions of the same word. Such a discovery would just mean "nature" (in the sense of the word that scientists use) is bigger than we thought it was.

If supernatural should have any meaning, I would allow to apply it to something that acts on our reality, but has no explanaition in our reality.

Yes it would "just" mean that there is something outside our reality. Something over and above, something super to our reality, something supernatural.

If you observe spontanous energy and just say, "hey, that breaks the fundamental laws of physics, but since I've observed it it's natural", then you're denying the fact that this is something very different from everything else in nature that can (or probably can) be described through known mechanisms of our known reality.