I would say that it is not necessarily the facial id that bothers me so much by itself, but combined with the continued reduction of free speech, which will lead to lesser things being bigger crimes it bothers me. How far from being microchipped do you think we are? As long as the government says it's for the good of the country everyone seems to say ok then. But what about the constitution?

If the major social networking sites cared very much about the people that traffick them and their rights, they should have some kind of software to prevent the NSA from stalking people via social media. But I'm sure that government and advertisers are wrapped up too tight in all of that. Do we have any idea the degree to which the NSA monitors social media? I'm also curious how they plan to advertise these more secure sites and how many users they think they can get.

Does this mean that if your neighbor and you both have comcast, but he doesn't subscribe to the internet service and you do, that he can now just use your "hot spot" for free? Do the people who are letting comcast use their location to set up a "hotspot" get any kind of kickback or reduced bill anyway? I think they should. I am also wondering if this is something that they are requiring of people in certain locations or just asking. And how much internet security can they provide?