Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Culture (Score 1) 257

I guess I should have made it more clear that the Cultural Revolution as not historic and influential in the context of changing the perspectives of the Chinese people on traditional Confucianism beliefs. As I've mentioned in my previous posts, it is argued that the Cultural Revolution increased activism activity in China with the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests, and the current allowance of single issue protests in China, but the ideology driving the Cultural Revolution, of being critical of everyone and everything, was mainly shunned upon afterwards.

Also, Mao's death was much more of the driving cause of the economic reforms than the cultural revolution. The economic reforms were something that was advocated by Deng Xiaoping even before the cultural revolution. Deng gained prestige within the party and public for his ideas especially given the failure of the Great Leap Forward. But of course, these ideas were at odds with Mao's, especially with Deng gaining influence and popularity. As a result, he was targeted and purged twice from office during the time of the Cultrual Revolution, and his more pragmatic views on economic reform was never implement. It was only after Mao's death, with his ascension to power, Deng was able to push forward his economic reforms. I guess you can argue that the Cultural Revolution may have made the party leaders question Mao's views (but then again the CR removed more of Mao's opponents from power and his ideology was still highly supported afterwards), but for the most part, the economic reforms are the result of Mao's death and Deng's ascension.

Comment Re:Culture (Score 2, Informative) 257

goobertoo wrote:

Why is this modded, "Flamebait"? His the parent's post is correct. The gp post is iffy at best.
I'm going to assume the moderator was ignorant of the Cultural Revolution [wikipedia.org] rather than just being spiteful.

You believe the moderator was ignorant? Do you realizes that the Cultural Revolution promoted activism, and was against the traditional thinking of listening to elders, which runs against the argument of promoting "repressed individuality." From your link to wikipedia:

People were encouraged to criticize cultural institutions and to question their parents and teachers, which had been strictly forbidden in Confucian culture. This was emphasized even more during the Anti-Lin Biao; Anti-Confucius Campaign. Slogans such as 'Parents may love me, but not as much as Chairman Mao' were common. [...] Some commentators argue that the Cultural Revolution years saw the Chinese people leave behind many uncritical habits of conformist and authoritarian thinking. This can be seen in the words of some of the student leaders of the Tiananmen Square protests of 1989."

Even beside the fact that the Cultural Revolution was about activism, it's hardly historic and influential, as it's viewed negatively by both the Chinese Government and the Chinese public. Again from your link:

"Today, the Cultural Revolution is seen by most people inside and outside of China, including the Communist Party of China and Chinese democracy movement supporters, as an unmitigated disaster, and as an event to be avoided in the future. There are no politically significant groups within China that defend the Cultural Revolution. [...]The PRC's official version of history regards the Cultural Revolution as a serious error by Mao Zedong, whose contribution to history was 70% good and 30% bad. "

While you may be right it's not exactly flame bait, but it sure was ignorant.

goobertoo wrote:

Also, saying the Chinese invented the compass is about as accurate as saying the Greeks invented the steam engine. While technically true, in both cases they were clueless as to what they had discovered or how to leverage it. In the Greek's case, the invention went completely under developed. In the Chinese case, it was actually foreigners who adopted it for navigation and taught the Chinese to use it for something other than Chi lines and harmony.

This is just hogwash. From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compass:

The earliest recorded actual use of a magnetized needle for navigational purposes is found in Zhu Yu's book Pingzhou Table Talks (èæåè; Pingzhou Ketan) of 1119 (written from 1111 to 1117): The navigator knows the geography, he watches the stars at night, watches the sun at day; when it is dark and cloudy, he watches the compass. [...]The first European mention of a magnetized needle and its use among sailors occurs in Alexander Neckam's De naturis rerum (On the Natures of Things), probably written in Paris in 1190.

Slashdot Top Deals

The reward for working hard is more hard work.

Working...