You're fucking retarded, seriously, what the fuck are you even talking about. There's something called a GEOLOGICAL RECORD that we can read to gain information about climate history, from sediments, rocks, ice, and more.

so why do you even need a brain then if you just sign it over to anyone who claims to be official you are scum

What the fuck is wrong with your brain

what the fuck are you talking about god you're insanely rabid. What gives you the right to lecture, in your opinion? You make absolutely no sense. The man is commenting on public trust of science, what the literal FUCK are you talking about and why does every worthless shit comment you squirt out of your asshole and post here get modded up?

holy FUCK the irony, god you're a stupid sack of shit

Meanwhile the models have been completely wrong every single time

http://www.globalwarming.org/2...

So the theory has no proof, except for a bunch of insane liberals jacking eachother off with smug bullshit.

RECAP since you don't seem to have a fucking brain:
ALL THE MODELS ARE WRONG
THAT MEANS THE THEORY IS WRONG
IF GLOBAL WARMING WAS CAUSED BY HUMAN INDUCED CO2 EMISSIONS THE MODELS WOULDN'T BE COMPLETELY FUCKING WRONG

retards

Yeah just call everything you don't agree with ignorance and never provide citations or argue back, and ESPECIALLY never answer the question.

If my point of view is so ignorant, surely you could clear it up with a simple sentence or two?

Not an argument, appeal to authority, the fact is you're much more ignorant than you accuse me of being. You have no comprehension of the point of view you evangelize, you just chose it to fit in.

This is an example of the brainlesslessness, caused by over-centralized education, that is destroying our society.

No one can use nuclear weapons against any other party that has nuclear weapons.

First, North Korea is not the insane 'shithole' that western propaganda makes it out to be. They didn't just have everything handed to them by the Soviets. It's not by blind luck that they fought off the United States and maintained independence. Have a little respect for your enemy, if that's what you choose them to be, though what threat they actually pose to the west, besides setting a 'bad example' for other would be nationalistic entities, I can't imagine.

Anyway, Kim Jong Un in all likelihood has absolutely no power to unilaterally launch nuclear attacks or any other major military offensive, and even if he did, he's not crazy, no one anywhere near his position is that crazy.

This nuclear stalemate situation ends in one of two ways:

The first and more likely is that our insane warmongers, whipped into action by the financial institutions, push North Korea to the point where they have no future as a nationalistic entity, and decide they would rather destroy as much of the west as possible than become enslaved to the western financial system and suffer the fate of countries like Germany and Japan with dangerously declining birthrates and/or loss of national identity (chill out liberals, that's just how countries like N Korea, Iran, and others see it, whether it's objectively true or not I won't argue).

The other way is if one party has a missile defense system that as of present seems nonexistent and coming no time soon. The fact of the matter is that it's extremely hard to maintain targeting on such a small object even if you know exactly where it launched from. You only have so long to intercept it before it maneuvers and very likely goes out of sight. ICBMs are not dumb bee-line things. Decoys and other countermeasures make things even harder, and of course weather is always a problem.

I see no evidence of anything you're saying

By who? Everyone is being told the same thing? What about the internet "choose your own reality"/"fake news" blahblahblah? I'm talking about "leak" being appropriated as a buzzword.

This is probably an illusion caused by the massive centralization of power. Pretty sure they're always fulfilling their role of warping reality to people who don't have access to first-hand information of events.

No one can use nuclear weapons against any other party that has nuclear weapons. North Korea is not the insane 'shithole' that western propaganda makes it out to be. They didn't just have everything handed to them by the Soviets. It's not by blind luck that they fought off the United States and maintained independence. Have a little respect for your enemy, if that's what you choose them to be, though what threat they actually pose to the west, besides setting a 'bad example' for other would be nationalistic entities, I can't imagine. Anyway, Kim Jong Un in all likelihood has absolutely no power to unilaterally launch nuclear attacks or any other major military offensive, and even if he did, he's not crazy, no one anywhere near his position is that crazy. This nuclear stalemate situation ends in one of two ways: The first and more likely is that our insane warmongers, whipped into action by the financial institutions, push North Korea to the point where they have no future as a nationalistic entity, and decide they would rather destroy as much of the west as possible than become enslaved to the western financial system and suffer the fate of countries like Germany and Japan with dangerously declining birthrates and/or loss of national identity (chill out liberals, that's just how countries like N Korea, Iran, and others see it, whether it's objectively true or not I won't argue). The other way is if one party has a missile defense system that as of present seems nonexistent and coming no time soon. The fact of the matter is that it's extremely hard to maintain targeting on such a small object even if you know exactly where it launched from. You only have so long to intercept it before it maneuvers and very likely goes out of sight. ICBMs are not dumb bee-line things. Decoys and other countermeasures make things even harder, and of course weather is always a problem.

Out of all the forces of nature we have first-hand experience of, not necessarily of all the forces we have seen evidence of, the greenhouse gas theory is the most likely.

This is the best argument that can be made for human-caused climate change.

We aren't talking about some simple system here. We can't just jump to conclusions. This is the ENTIRE WORLD weather system. It may be governed by forces we are not totally aware of or are totally ignorant of.

What exactly is the proof that global warming is due to human carbon emissions rather than a natural warming cycle with all the fermentation products in the soil and water from the beginning of the last ice age to present that are being released?

"Climate change" theorists do not seem to be able to answer this question, but it is the crux of the validity of their point of view.
Do they realize that the ice age literally just happened on a geological time-scale? That geological science just sprouted out of nowhere in the last 150 years and it's mostly been used to exploit coal, gas, oil, and minerals? There is only so much we have experience with, and only so much our theories can tell us. We simply do not know much about the planet's long-term weather/climate cycles, there is only so much the geological record has told us, it has only been looked into for so much.

Just everybody chill out.
There are much bigger and more immediate problems related to human presence that are objectively proven in cause and effect that are ravaging our not only our planet's natural state, but our own lives.

Honestly this "climate change" issue seems like a distraction from these issues, manipulating people into guilt over something that they have a very indirect influence on. Sorry but your efforts to 'go green' mean absolutely nothing in the face of industrial pollution, the most immediate and terrible effects of which would not be climate change even if that were proven to be the cause.

We need to worry about our society, the centralization of power: mass surveillance, automation, wealth disparity, human rights (especially freedom of speech and quality of education), the list goes on.
You cannot do ANYTHING about climate change until you deal with these problems. Stop kidding yourself.

The media machine is now pushing "leaked" as a synonym for "definitely true no need to ask questions"