It COULD drive more traffic. But apparently it doesn't. I'm guessing Facebook, like Google, tends to print handy Slashdot-like summaries of news, but unlike our Awesome Community here, most Facebook readers do not in fact RTFA. Go Figure

Now, I'm absolutely positive that Amazon engages in what most will consider anti0competitive behavior. But creating products similar to existing ones and selling them for less is not, generally speaking, anti-competitive. Nor is it illegal. And while I feel for the small tripod company, implying that Wayfair is somehow small and helpless borders on the ridiculous.

Why would you ever allow someone to share something that's been flagged as false? I mean, shouldn't the behavior be that you get an error message saying sorry this is false and you're not allowed to spread falsehoods? And shouldn't that be the behavior all the time not just right around the election?

It seems to me that Apple has not chosen to use Java, and thus has not been sued by Oracle. Instead of implementing their own version of Java, they've implemented their own version of C called Objective C, and created the Swift Interpreter on top of that. The original authors of the C programming language have not chosen to sue Apple. Yet.

I just think it's really, truly sad that Twitter even needs this rule.

I'm glad I'm not the only one who found those two assertions in the summary to be ridiculous.

It seems SpaceX has vastly underestimated how much people hate their cable companies.

I'm not clear on why the unit is being denied access to the server, but the customer was afforded the opportunity to return his purchase to Amazon for a refund. If the iPhone app is really that bad, I imagine that this company will have many unsatisfied customers and not be around very long.

I used to buy epi-pens for $30 each. Then they went to $60 each... then... you know the story. $55 is way cheaper than $300, but it's still a far ways from "super cheap"

It's totally better than vi

See subject

Metaphorically at least.

No Script. That is all.

I think it's ironic that this piece of dribble is published by the same newspaper that called Robert Goddard a crackpot who didn't understand High School Physics because everyone knows I rocket can't fly in a vacuum-- since there's nothing for the thrust to push against.

See Subject. It's not completely automagic, but it can probably do what you want.