Comment Re:Waiting... (Score 1) 87
Half the time Siri doesn't work at all for me
At least Siri isn't wrong half the time for you, that's pretty good compared to my experience.
Comment IT Certificate (Score 5, Insightful) 238
Comment Re:right idea - Wrong fuel (Score 1) 230
Comment Re:EDDE (Score 3, Informative) 105
What magic material will they make this net out of?
This PDF slide deck has some additional details. It describes them as "50-g mesh nets", I couldn't tell you how they are supposed to work.
Comment EDDE (Score 3, Interesting) 105
A small fleet of net-flinging spacecraft could clear every big piece of space junk out of low-Earth orbit within a dozen years, according to a researcher working on the concept. Each spacecraft, known as an ElectroDynamic Debris Eliminator (EDDE), would capture orbital debris in a net, then drag the junk down out of harm's way. The EDDEs would draw their power from the sun and from Earth's magnetic field rather than rely on costly chemical propellants, helping keep costs down, said Jerome Pearson, president of Star Technology and Research, Inc.
Comment Better than fingerprints, no concent required (Score 1) 2
Submission + - Scotland Yard IS using facial recognition tech (cbsnews.com) 2
Meanwhile, the vigilante group trying an amateur stab applying facial recognition to the riot photos abandoned the project because the results sucked: http://www.forbes.com/sites/kashmirhill/2011/08/11/london-riots-facial-recognition-vigilantes-abandon-their-project/
This is the big test of the surveillance state that London has become. Are all those cameras effective, or just taking a toll on privacy without bringing added security? http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2011/08/london-is-the-surveillance-societys-biggest-test-yet/243445/
Submission + - US Energy Panel Cautiously Endorses Fracking
Submission + - Why Google needs Firefox (extremetech.com)
Submission + - Obama Reverses Again, Closing Datacenters (smartertechnology.com)
Comment Re:...And one generation behind on HTML5 (Score 1) 341
> There's "fat-val", "tracer JIT" and "method JIT". Just curious, given all these advances in JS speed, are there technical reasons why stuff like Python, Ruby and Perl aren't getting similar improvements in speed?
Python, Ruby, and Perl are all server side scripts as opposed to Javascript which is run inside the client's browser. I'm sure the run speed of the other languages is improving over time, it just isn't in the spotlight that the browsers get.