I didn't mean to offend you, sir. Then again, I didn't see you standing there.

I'm not really sure what the second bit of your response was speaking to, but I'm sure you're game to explain it to this poor simpleton.

For my part, I was simply responding to a targeting prompt with the first guy that met the given criteria.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

When do you think Sonic the Hedgehog was released?

I like Airbnbs because I like to sleep in places where my bed isn't 2 feet (through a wall) from someone running an orgy at 2am.

Maybe that's just me, though.

But only right after the midterms, and only if they lost in spite of whatever meddling they had done based on their findings of exploitable vulnerabilities in the given voting machines.

The old 5% tax write off fund.

Additionally, I propose it be broadened to stuff like cars.

The original KITT was a Pontiac Firebird, so not the most awesome car out there at the time...or even close.

A reboot in the same spirit of the original would probably just be whatever the current Camaro is.

Not to be unintentionally pedantic; the operating principle of the timekeeping mechanism in a glowy radium watch isn't nuclear.

Since I'm an internet expert on everything, i'd refer to your watch as radioluminescent, or scintillating if you're fancy.

How about a Holy Hand Grenade? Just as esplodey, but with more Jesus in it. In my experience, hard drinkin' and Jesus go together like peas and carrots.

That's it.

Yep, but this wil "democratize" the practice. With Doom, you at least had to have a skillset involved to do the same thing.

This will be used to create shooter games with maps in schools and businesses that will be used to rehearse shootings, robberies, and other criminal endeavors.

So you're saying that if the agent aquires ENOUGH money, then I'm essentially in the clear.

If I tell an AI agent to aquire as much money as possible, would I be liable for it robbing one or more banks?