Creedo, do you vote? If you do, you are attempting to impose your beliefs (wrong or right) on your community (of varying scope). Why is it wrong for people who believe something with which you disagree to exercise this same privilege? If you don't vote, please excuse the rant - at least you're consistent.
So, I wrote the rest of this, then realized it's auxiliary, but I'll leave it anyway. My main point (which you missed) is that, if you do get pregnant inconveniently, you should bear the baby to term and give it up for adoption rather than murder it. Science is unquestionably on my side on this one. If you know when babies start to feel pain, when you can tell their gender, etcetera, you have to start to understand that current abortion law is a complete violation of the most basic human right - life.
Talk about misinformation. Your post has two of my favorite things: telling me what I think and being wrong about it. I *really* don't know why you tie misinformation and abstinence teaching together. One does not imply the other, by any means. I was abstinent until marriage, and I'm very happy with how that's working out for me, and it turns out sex is just as great as I was led to believe. If I could go back several years...I'd still wait until marriage. And seriously, I don't know ANY Christians who wouldn't want their kids to know that sperm getting to an egg (which is only there to catch it periodically) is the one and only way to get pregnant. Not getting pregnant and not getting STD's are NOT the reasons you should wait until you're married to have sex. There are plenty of other reasons I waited, and none of them are fear-motivated.
Look, if you think teaching people how to roll a condom onto a banana is important to keep people from getting pregnant, I'm afraid I probably can't help you. Anyone who needs to be taught how to use a condom...just, total fail. I think that ought to be a lower priority for schools where such a high percentage of kids can't read their own diplomas.
And seriously, all you haters, I know you gotta hate, but could you please be a little more specific with your reasoning? It's difficult to argue against broad generalizations that are based on, I dunno, how you see those stupid Christians in movies and on tv act. Srsly, guys. Big reasoning fail. Think for yourself a little bit. Be tolerant, or whatever.
Please help me understand what is sick and twisted about "Don't have sex outside of marriage (which, if modeled after biblical ideals, will provide a warm, loving environment for childhood), and if you do and make a baby, give the baby up for adoption rather than kill it."?
P.S. I'm not saying the Bible advocates giving up your kid for adoption if you deem yourself unable to provide the child a warm, loving environment, but I certainly advocate it.
PL/I -- "the fatal disease" -- belongs more to the problem set than to the solution set. -- Edsger W. Dijkstra, SIGPLAN Notices, Volume 17, Number 5