Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Movies

New Riddick Movie Made Possible By Games? 160

Hugh Pickens writes "Scott Harris writes on Moviefone that the economics of Hollywood are often baffling, as DVD sales, broadcast fees and merchandising tie-ins balance against advertising costs and pay-or-play deals to form an accounting maze. The latest example is the untitled sequel to The Chronicles of Riddick, released in 2004 to a slew of negative reviews and general viewer indifference. Despite its hefty $105 million budget, most of which was spent on special effects, the film topped out at a paltry $57 million domestically. So how can a sequel be made if the movie lost money? The answer has to do with ancillary profits from revenue streams outside the box office. While the combined $116 million worldwide probably still didn't cover distribution and advertising costs, it likely brought the film close to even, meaning DVD sales and profits from the tie-in video game franchise may have put the movie in the black. In addition, Riddick itself was a sequel to Pitch Black, a modestly budgeted ($23 million) success back in 2000. Extending the franchise to a third film may help boost ancillary profits by introducing the Pitch Black and Chronicles of Riddick DVDs and merchandise to new audiences, meaning that the new film may not even need to break even to eventually turn a profit for the studio."

Comment Re:Sawyer: Incompetent Writer, Attention Whore (Score 2, Informative) 80

I wouldn't bother reading his other books then. People keep buying me Robert Sawyer books as presents as I think the Galaxy bookshop (Sydney's big SF shop) recommends him if you like hard SF. I wish they wouldn't. I agree with the comments about his characters and his Canadian inferiority complex is just plain annoying.

Maybe fans of Michael Crichton's characterisation will appreciate Sawyer's works.

Comment My Access/MySQL Experience (Score 1) 353

I setup a backend database using MySQL at my old office and used MS Access through ODBC as a client, as well as using the console client and Perl. I used "linked tables" to reference the MySQL tables from Access. This worked well, although some datatypes were incompatable. Must say I preferred the MySQL datatypes to Access'. Unfortunately Access 2000 seemed to have more incompatabilities. For databases involving complex queries I'm not sure I would go with MySQL based upon my experiences. However, the ability to use text based clients and Perl was wonderful because it meant I didn't have to waste time with umpteen mouse clicks. I also tried PostgreSQL but it was unable to transfer large quantities of data via ODBC. Now that I've gone I think the company is looking to purchase SQL Server. At least my new employer is Linux friendly!

Slashdot Top Deals

It appears that PL/I (and its dialects) is, or will be, the most widely used higher level language for systems programming. -- J. Sammet

Working...