Dear Mr. Dyson, thank you for doing something that you likely know is futile.
Why do atheists tend to chose what is worse (e.g., GPUs instead of software octree renderers, image-order instead of object-order rendering, a much more demanding approach and therefore pollutant and yet believe in global warming)? Why atheists still haven't understood that horizontal interaction destroys truth (e.g., cf. "How social influence can undermine the wisdom of crowd effect"). Why isn't slashdot's sinkhole-ness & idiocy, karma, notation system etc. criticized on scientific grounds? Why did Plato, Leibniz, Newton, Brouwer or Goedel believe in a most high god? Why do people reject ontological arguments? Why do atheists deny religion and at the same time follow twitter/facebook/today's heroes/little green men/Wittgenstein pocket gods or worship Mammon in their love of money? Why are axioms given to believers only? Why are so many convinced that the Higgs boson has been found? Why are researchers loving money more than truth in accepting grants to investigate losing strategies like raycasting?
A tentative reply: The fool has said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that does good. (Psalm 14.1)