This guys parrot the myth of Pomp.... it is cclear in reading his test that he simply know it is impossible by theory and just try to build a gigantic conspiracy theory and rationalization around hys myth... he assume Levi cannot be simply a scientist who see it works, that othere testers are fair, that wires were checked, that LENr is replicated, published in peer reviewed journals... it is at the level of 9/11 skepticism... it is cargo cult skepticism... he try to look skeptic but it is a believer in old theory. he is not even aware of Ed Storms 100% mainstream theory... it is not confirmed, but saying LENR breaks theory is an error. anyway I don't care, next week end I will be with serious guys at LENR-Cities project kickoff... too bad the big guys, bigger than Elforsk and Cherokee, are not yet invited, and there will be only startup, investors, and scientists... not yet the industrialists. the worst is that they conspiracy theory don't even address a real problem, raised by McKubre (a believer ah ah) which is annoyed by the calibration at only 450C (for fear to break the resistor by huge current below nominal temperature, can look strange but this resistor is said to be a doped conductor... probably to avoid runaway at 1400C)... anyway the test when power moved from 800W to 900W and temperature swinged from 1250C to 1400C, shows that the COP is not 1 and that LENr is real without any doubt... question is only about precision. too bad.

There is many reference to misconduct. One it MIT tweaking of result that their editor (Mallove) have spotted. http://www.infinite-energy.com... http://www.larouchepub.com/eiw... One is Science not correcting errors in caltech paper http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/R... there is also the Oriani paper rejection for no serious reason (theory) there is also the rejection upfront of Report41 of Enea (Denino) showing He4/Heat corelation http://www.rainews24.rai.it/ra... (as 40+ other journals) There is a report by Pamela Mosier Boss, ex SU Navy Spawar, prolific author in Naturwissenshaften and Journal of Electroanalythical Chemistry who complained about emotional behavior in high impact journals http://www.iscmns.org/CMNS/JCM... (page6+ in that proceeding). there are many more to list from the old ape of cold fusion... depending if you search academic misconduct, journal misconduct, insults, horse manure in the mailbox, nasty jokes ruining experiments, sabotaging grants by donators, demoting a researcher to the stock, ... some consider it is normal academic behavior, and it is in a way true, so maybe it is normal. Currently there are many report of similar problem, some by few Nobel like Sheckman or Sidney Brenner, who can afford to moan without being blacklisted. Maybe we cannot change that, not really say it is monstrous, but we should be aware that things works that nasty way, and not be too naive. Sorry for previous coward postings , forgot to logon...