Top of the thread.

They're calling it a 2 x 4. They're not saying that it's 2" x 4". There's a difference, and it's not subtle.

Maybe they'll use the name change as an opportunity to generate some further goodwill and kill off the browser plugin.

Flash does have uses outside the browser, and the new name reflects that. It's a completely dippy name for a browser plugin, though.

Adobe has ever been accused of forward thinking, but we can always hope.

...if they're smart enough to not sue Newegg?

"[H]igher quality publications"... That would rule out Reuters. Granted, they're not the AP, but still...

More to the point, how can you find out which chip the phone has before buying it?

Since when does Grado make $80 headphones?

Monster complaining that they're being bullied is rich.

Now they know how the legions of companies they've gone after for completely unrelated reasons feel.

They've deserved this for a very long time. It's nice to know that the boot they're feeling is being administered by a company big enough to not even remotely care how they feel about it.

There's one important element of these leaks that I've never seen anyone comment on: it's all well and good to hack a weak password, but how do these people wind up getting their hands on lists of celebrities' private email addresses? It's not like you can just throw some terms at Google and come up with anything useful.

Are you implying that the shooter in this case wasn't mentally disturbed?

Unless they've change it with this update, you can just skip the OCR half of the process, i.e. you only have to type the distorted text half.

You CAN do frame by frame advance: just hit "e".

Link to full article.

Even if he flat out stole the thing, 1973 was almost 40 years ago -- long past any statute of limitations. So where's the justification in trying to force him to return it?