I'm not sure what you meant by free. The article mentioned increased costs, but I didn't see anything about a new charge for something that was previously free.
I meant the consequence of bad actors abusing the cache information is that web visitors have longer page load times, bandwidth for users (like mobile data) and providers increases, the benefits of shared assets on CDNs is reduced, and web developers need new strategies to improve page load times.
What about other ISPs like fiber? Understanding MetroNet's pricing is difficult with mandatory fees and misleading "price lock" promotions hidden behind a sign-up wizard process
Many users have simple requirements like video streaming and web surfing that are fully satisfied by FWA, and they don't need to pay more for cable or fiber. FWA can be a cheap way to provide last-mile access. Is $53,000 per user justifiable for fiber?