Misrepresented Java developer (Score 1)

From wired article at http://www.wired.com/wiredenterprise/2012/05/oracle-google-verdict/

“Oracle, the nine million Java developers, and the entire Java community thank the jury for their verdict in this phase of the case,” the statement read. “The overwhelming evidence demonstrated that Google knew it needed a license and that its unauthorized fork of Java in Android shattered Java’s central write once run anywhere principle. Every major commercial enterprise — except Google — has a license for Java and maintains compatibility to run across all computing platforms.”

As one of the 9 million developer cited by oracle that thanked the jury, i would say that i was misrepresented by the Oracle lawyers. I do want Java to be open and to be used freely in Google Android and many other areas.
To Oracle lawyers, please do not include us as though as we are in accord to what you are doing.
To Oracle, come on guys, the best you can do is Java Mobile Edition ???, Blackberry OS 7 and below ???, go innovate and develop a Java Mobile OS that is worth the licensing fee you would charge from the manufacturer and slap a Java logo on it.