Re:couple of bits (Score 1)

okay, i guess he didn't claim ignorance of NAT, but sheesh. getting him to acknowledge the possibility of ip masquerading was like pulling teeth. moving on...

Most P2P systems are probably on 192.168.1.0/24 -- why waste precious bandwidth sharing that useless detail?

i meant: "why would kazaa waste bandwidth putting a locally resolved address into protocol payload?" reading further into the deposition, it sounds like that's really what kazaa is doing. i'm still puzzled as to why. what sort of different actions might a kazaa peer take? I confess to being totally ignorant of kazaa. ...and it's a bummer for the defense, because that makes it really easy to see that there was no NAT device involved. though the defense lawyer didn't seem to pick up on that detail.