Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:OK (Score 1) 286

I'd agree to that, and don't have much more to add, actually. Very well put. Stick 'em outside and let kids be kids. Too much tech at a young age can just confuse them, unless they have an unusual aptitude or something. And frankly, I don't use txt at all - had my phone company disable it. Don't want it, don't need it, too expensive. "Oh", I hear you say, "but you can just get an unlimited txt plan". Yep - for more money. Once again, you have to SPEND money to SAVE money. Just doesn't make sense to me :) When someone asks me if I got their txt message, I just say "Sorry, you'll have to actually CALL me".
Communications

45-Year-Old Modem Used To Surf the Web 622

EdIII writes with this awesome snippet from Hack a Day: "'[phreakmonkey] got his hands on a great piece of old tech. It's a 1964 Livermore Data Systems Model A Acoustic Coupler Modem. He recieved it in 1989 and recently decided to see if it would actually work. It took some digging to find a proper D25 adapter and even then the original serial adapter wasn't working because the oscillator depends on the serial voltage. He dials in and connects at 300baud. Then logs into a remote system and fires up lynx to load Wikipedia. Lucky for [phreakmonkey] they managed to decide on a modulation standard in 1962. It's still amazing to see this machine working 45 years later.' Although impractical for surfing the Internet today, there is something truly cool about getting a 45-year old modem to work with modern technology. The question I have, is what is the oldest working piece of equipment fellow Slashdotters have out there? I'm afraid as far back as I can go is a Number Nine Imagine 128 Series 2 Graphics card on a server still in use at my house which only puts me at about 14 years."

Comment Re:36 new features, huh? (Score 1) 509

Well said :)

Let's also not forget that ALL version of Windows, from NT on up, have been written to comply with C2 security standards:

http://windowsitpro.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=2293
http://vdict.com/Orange%20Book,6,0,0.html

Which proves your point, it's the USER, not the OS, that lends itself toward a lack of security.

One could argue that C2 isn't enough - but that's another /. article :)

Slashdot Top Deals

Hotels are tired of getting ripped off. I checked into a hotel and they had towels from my house. -- Mark Guido

Working...