Use OpenNIC instead - less schennigans

So YOU'RE the guy --who is running Big-Endian AMD64 !! (*cvs)

Most of what they are ripping out is archaic, un-realistic, or poor implementations platforms. You could argue that hacked-support for too many platforms is part of the reason openssl is in the position its in today - if you can't do it right (or don't have the resources to), don't do it. Name a platform other than VMS, they've ripped out and that you need : )

...and apparently no video was to be seen in my browser prior to bitching. Applying self-face-palm....

Anybody notice this story doesn't link to a real article, nor is Curtis Peterson mentioned once on that Forbes page linked to? Its written by a guy named "Ben Kepes", and 'Server Hugger' is only mentioned in the title, thats it.....wtf?

perhaps if all the companies making billions off free software were to actually contribute to and fund such open projects, they'd be able to employ the necessary team to find those bugs. if companies don't want to act responsibly about the software they use, then they bear the burden. boohoo.

converse to the argument "this is the price you pay for 'free'", if openssl were a closed development project owned by some company, its certainly possible the same flaw could have existed, except they wouldn't have to tell anyone about it once found -> some hardware might have never gotten fixed, or the bug could have propagated into many more products over many years, the sum-total of that discovery would be far beyond what we are looking at now.

" The wing broke off on the left hand side." Yeah but it didn't....both wings intact in all photos....

it didn't do a upgrade from 7-9 for me, it just side-by-sided anyways. uninstalled. im tired of waiting for the next vulnerability by a company who doesn't appear to care (anymore?)

you read, and understand what that statement you C&P means, right?

Wow, look at all 96 of those memes....

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/responses

how exactly did you want them to respond to a petition that by their own rules forces them to respond if given enough votes?

If you _re-read_ his post, he is only showing evidence, and claims that Nokia NOT OPERA is a MITM. use of the word "attack" obviously doesnt apply. But it is -extremely clear that Nokia is intercepting and repackaging https traffic. Opera is not, and their privacy policy clearly states that Opera passes HTTPS untouched and only boosts -normal HTTP traffic-

I may be left wondering why you have no concern that a secure https connection you expect to a website is infact, not to that website, but is decrypted -atleast!- once, before being reencrypted to the site you expected. If you are fine with that I wonder what kind of security professional YOU may claim to be.....