I realize that I have so far written nothing in a serious tone. However, the majority of my entries will be much more serious. I have just been rather bored, so I didn't feel like boring myself any further.
I'm curious as to how long uncooked bacon can last. I mean, sure it's better than attempting this with uncooked steak (much better). I do realize that the meat's been cured, but just how much time does the curing process add on to the amount of time before this bacon is inedible?
Also, where is he putting all of this bacon? I mean if he's carrying around 3,000 pounds of bacon, how is he going to also carry his luggage? Unless he wears bacon clothing -- or the same clothes everyday (or no clothes at all, for that matter) -- I don't see where his clothes are supposed to go. If he's going to a cold climate, I suppose that would solve all problems. The meat would last even longer and he could wear all of his clothes at once to stay warm.
Anyone have any ideas on this? I wouldn't even think to attempt this. I would probably start eating my money. I would cook it first, of course. I would need a really big skillet or something.
Doubly unfortunately, they'll only project their laws across borders if you're a billion dollar corporation.
Or the equivalent of a billion dollar corporation.
Yes, as you can see in this picture, South Sudan's leader truly takes his country's name seriously. In case you don't know which of the two leaders is him, he is the one on the right.
This is my first entry, obviously. I actually wrote another entry, but forgot to submit it. That entry stated everything I would write about in this journal as well as who I am. As a result, I am obligated to sum up what that entry would have said. The most appropriate means of doing so without rewriting the entire entry is to edit out the part that states who I am. Also, I would like to shorten the list I made of topics I would likely write about. This list, of course, included a somewhat wi
Sorry.
I seem to have been mistaken. It's been a while since I've properly looked at voting laws. Apparently, it was a state law that I was thinking of, not a federal law.
I might still be mistaken, so feel free to correct my correction.
I mean, barcodes were invented to be unique identifiers, so it was perfectly logical for the county to assume that they could be used in order to eliminate the presence of identifying markings. Yeah, that should make sense to anyone who doesn't think.
My thoughts on the judge's decision? I don't know what to think anymore. It's a justifiable decision. Nevertheless, the use of these identifiers to determine who individuals voted for (which would inevitably be discovered if anyone looked at the ballots) would be illegal. Unless we don't have the right to withhold such information anymore.
It's also interesting that both the judge and the county should come to the decisions that they have. Seeing as how the government is trying to encourage people to vote, I imagine that potential voters in the county are getting mixed signals from this.
"Take that, you hostile sons-of-bitches!" -- James Coburn, in the finale of _The_President's_Analyst_
